diff options
author | Matthew Sotoudeh <matthew@masot.net> | 2023-01-04 22:44:59 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Matthew Sotoudeh <matthew@masot.net> | 2023-01-04 22:44:59 -0800 |
commit | 11c88f26a892d802ce4680349fb8ec03f73dbc0b (patch) | |
tree | 3826f5ecf8d73555431ea5af9814e6a1dce48d97 | |
parent | 8f6cde5e0dbfd58c40b4944b6c5622979bdad6e0 (diff) |
ack + typo
-rw-r--r-- | README.md | 5 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ without the system interpreting them as axioms: by {Taut}; ``` -Second, if you prove some claim directly from an earlier claim, you can alway +Second, if you prove some claim directly from an earlier claim, you can always introduce the implication of the two claims (which now no longer depends on the earlier claim): ``` @@ -188,3 +188,6 @@ above. The main concern is the `{Generalize}` pseudo-claim and how it determines which variables we can generalize (maybe we need to do better tracking of assumption discharging). + +## Thanks +Thanks David K Zhang for very helpful conversations. |