- Merges queue-interrogation branch into the trunk. This branch adds extra phases of looking for additional conflicts during and after the heuristic pivoting stage. (For the expected performance gain, comparing jobs 1676 and 1643 gives a rough idea.)

1 files changed, 47 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/src/theory/arith/simplex.cpp b/src/theory/arith/simplex.cpp
index 0e2c3797e..dc451288b 100644
--- a/src/theory/arith/simplex.cpp
+++ b/src/theory/arith/simplex.cpp
@@ -9,6 +9,11 @@ using namespace CVC4::kind;
 using namespace CVC4::theory;
 using namespace CVC4::theory::arith;
 
+static const bool LATE_COMER = true;
+static const bool s_CHECK_AFTER_PIVOT = true;
+static const uint32_t DIFF_CHECK_PERIOD = 20;
+static const uint32_t VARORDER_CHECK_PERIOD = 100;
+
 SimplexDecisionProcedure::Statistics::Statistics():
   d_statPivots("theory::arith::pivots",0),
   d_statUpdates("theory::arith::updates",0),
@@ -20,6 +25,8 @@ SimplexDecisionProcedure::Statistics::Statistics():
   d_successBeforeDiffSearch("theory::arith::successBeforeDiffSearch",0),
   d_attemptAfterDiffSearch("theory::arith::attemptAfterDiffSearch",0),
   d_successAfterDiffSearch("theory::arith::successAfterDiffSearch",0),
+  d_attemptDuringDiffSearch("theory::arith::attemptDuringDiffSearch",0),
+  d_successDuringDiffSearch("theory::arith::successDuringDiffSearch",0),
   d_attemptDuringVarOrderSearch("theory::arith::attemptDuringVarOrderSearch",0),
   d_successDuringVarOrderSearch("theory::arith::successDuringVarOrderSearch",0),
   d_delayedConflicts("theory::arith::delayedConflicts",0),
@@ -39,6 +46,8 @@ SimplexDecisionProcedure::Statistics::Statistics():
   StatisticsRegistry::registerStat(&d_successBeforeDiffSearch);
   StatisticsRegistry::registerStat(&d_attemptAfterDiffSearch);
   StatisticsRegistry::registerStat(&d_successAfterDiffSearch);
+  StatisticsRegistry::registerStat(&d_attemptDuringDiffSearch);
+  StatisticsRegistry::registerStat(&d_successDuringDiffSearch);
   StatisticsRegistry::registerStat(&d_attemptDuringVarOrderSearch);
   StatisticsRegistry::registerStat(&d_successDuringVarOrderSearch);
 
@@ -63,6 +72,8 @@ SimplexDecisionProcedure::Statistics::~Statistics(){
   StatisticsRegistry::unregisterStat(&d_successBeforeDiffSearch);
   StatisticsRegistry::unregisterStat(&d_attemptAfterDiffSearch);
   StatisticsRegistry::unregisterStat(&d_successAfterDiffSearch);
+  StatisticsRegistry::unregisterStat(&d_attemptDuringDiffSearch);
+  StatisticsRegistry::unregisterStat(&d_successDuringDiffSearch);
   StatisticsRegistry::unregisterStat(&d_attemptDuringVarOrderSearch);
   StatisticsRegistry::unregisterStat(&d_successDuringVarOrderSearch);
 
@@ -399,15 +410,17 @@ Node betterConflict(TNode x, TNode y){
   else return y;
 }
 
-Node SimplexDecisionProcedure::findConflictOnTheQueue(SearchPeriod type) {
+Node SimplexDecisionProcedure::findConflictOnTheQueue(SearchPeriod type, bool returnFirst) {
   TimerStat::CodeTimer codeTimer(d_statistics.d_findConflictOnTheQueueTime);
 
   switch(type){
   case BeforeDiffSearch:     ++(d_statistics.d_attemptBeforeDiffSearch); break;
+  case DuringDiffSearch:     ++(d_statistics.d_attemptDuringDiffSearch); break;
   case AfterDiffSearch:      ++(d_statistics.d_attemptAfterDiffSearch); break;
   case DuringVarOrderSearch: ++(d_statistics.d_attemptDuringVarOrderSearch); break;
   }
 
+  bool success = false;
   Node firstConflict = Node::null();
   ArithPriorityQueue::const_iterator i = d_queue.begin();
   ArithPriorityQueue::const_iterator end = d_queue.end();
@@ -417,7 +430,8 @@ Node SimplexDecisionProcedure::findConflictOnTheQueue(SearchPeriod type) {
     if(d_tableau.isBasic(x_i)){
       Node possibleConflict = checkBasicForConflict(x_i);
       if(!possibleConflict.isNull()){
-        if(firstConflict.isNull()){
+        success = true;
+        if(returnFirst && firstConflict.isNull()){
           firstConflict = possibleConflict;
         }else{
           delayConflictAsLemma(possibleConflict);
@@ -425,9 +439,10 @@ Node SimplexDecisionProcedure::findConflictOnTheQueue(SearchPeriod type) {
       }
     }
   }
-  if(!firstConflict.isNull()){
+  if(success){
     switch(type){
     case BeforeDiffSearch:     ++(d_statistics.d_successBeforeDiffSearch); break;
+    case DuringDiffSearch:     ++(d_statistics.d_successDuringDiffSearch); break;
     case AfterDiffSearch:      ++(d_statistics.d_successAfterDiffSearch); break;
     case DuringVarOrderSearch: ++(d_statistics.d_successDuringVarOrderSearch); break;
     }
@@ -442,7 +457,6 @@ Node SimplexDecisionProcedure::updateInconsistentVars(){
   static unsigned int instance = 0;
   ++instance;
 
-  static const uint32_t CHECK_PERIOD = 100;
   Debug("arith::updateInconsistentVars") << "begin updateInconsistentVars() "
                                          << instance << endl;
 
@@ -453,16 +467,37 @@ Node SimplexDecisionProcedure::updateInconsistentVars(){
     possibleConflict = findConflictOnTheQueue(BeforeDiffSearch);
   }
   if(possibleConflict.isNull()){
+    uint32_t pivotsSoFar = 0;
     possibleConflict = searchForFeasibleSolution<minBoundAndRowCount>(d_numVariables + 1);
+    while(!d_queue.empty() &&
+          possibleConflict.isNull() &&
+          pivotsSoFar <= d_numVariables + 1){
+      possibleConflict = searchForFeasibleSolution<minBoundAndRowCount>(DIFF_CHECK_PERIOD);
+      pivotsSoFar += DIFF_CHECK_PERIOD;
+      //Once every CHECK_PERIOD examine the entire queue for conflicts
+      if(possibleConflict.isNull()){
+        possibleConflict = findConflictOnTheQueue(DuringDiffSearch);
+      }
+    }
   }
-  if(d_queue.size() > 1 && possibleConflict.isNull()){
-    possibleConflict = findConflictOnTheQueue(AfterDiffSearch);
+
+  if(LATE_COMER){
+    if(d_queue.size() > 1 && possibleConflict.isNull()){
+      possibleConflict = findConflictOnTheQueue(AfterDiffSearch);
+    }else if (d_queue.size() > 1){
+      findConflictOnTheQueue(AfterDiffSearch, false);
+    }
+  }else{
+    if(d_queue.size() > 1 && possibleConflict.isNull()){
+      possibleConflict = findConflictOnTheQueue(AfterDiffSearch);
+    }
   }
+
   if(!d_queue.empty() && possibleConflict.isNull()){
     d_queue.transitionToVariableOrderMode();
 
     while(!d_queue.empty() && possibleConflict.isNull()){
-      possibleConflict = searchForFeasibleSolution<minVarOrder>(CHECK_PERIOD);
+      possibleConflict = searchForFeasibleSolution<minVarOrder>(VARORDER_CHECK_PERIOD);
 
       //Once every CHECK_PERIOD examine the entire queue for conflicts
       if(possibleConflict.isNull()){
@@ -549,9 +584,11 @@ Node SimplexDecisionProcedure::searchForFeasibleSolution(uint32_t remainingItera
     }
     Assert(x_j != ARITHVAR_SENTINEL);
     //Check to see if we already have a conflict with x_j to prevent wasteful work
-    Node earlyConflict = checkBasicForConflict(x_j);
-    if(!earlyConflict.isNull()){
-      return earlyConflict;
+    if(s_CHECK_AFTER_PIVOT){
+      Node earlyConflict = checkBasicForConflict(x_j);
+      if(!earlyConflict.isNull()){
+        return earlyConflict;
+      }
     }
   }
   Assert(remainingIterations == 0);