summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/decision/justification_heuristic.cpp
blob: 77f4cd56c6959ef97a526bdb4fac5445bd5f1b4c (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
/*********************                                                        */
/*! \file justification_heuristic.cpp
 ** \verbatim
 ** Original author: kshitij
 ** Major contributors: none
 ** Minor contributors (to current version): dejan
 ** This file is part of the CVC4 prototype.
 ** Copyright (c) 2009-2012  The Analysis of Computer Systems Group (ACSys)
 ** Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
 ** New York University
 ** See the file COPYING in the top-level source directory for licensing
 ** information.\endverbatim
 **
 ** \brief Justification heuristic for decision making
 **
 ** A ATGP-inspired justification-based decision heuristic. See
 ** [insert reference] for more details. This code is, or not, based
 ** on the CVC3 implementation of the same heuristic -- note below.
 **
 ** It needs access to the simplified but non-clausal formula.
 **/
/*****************************************************************************/
/*!
 * file search_sat.cpp
 * brief Implementation of Search engine with generic external sat solver
 *
 * Author: Clark Barrett
 *
 * Created: Wed Dec  7 21:00:24 2005
 *
 * <hr>
 *
 * License to use, copy, modify, sell and/or distribute this software
 * and its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without
 * royalty, subject to the terms and conditions defined in the \ref
 * LICENSE file provided with this distribution.
 * 
 * <hr>
 */
/*****************************************************************************/

#include "justification_heuristic.h"

#include "expr/node_manager.h"
#include "expr/kind.h"
#include "theory/rewriter.h"
#include "util/ite_removal.h"

/***
Here's the main idea

   Given a boolean formula "node", the goal is to try to make it
evaluate to "desiredVal" (true/false). for instance if "node" is a AND
formula we want to make it evaluate to true, we'd like one of the
children to be true. this is done recursively.

***/

/*

CVC3 code <---->  this code
 
 value            desiredVal
 getValue(lit)    litVal

***/


// Local helper functions for just this file



// JustificationHeuristic stuff

void JustificationHeuristic::setJustified(TNode n)
{
  d_justified.insert(n);
}

bool JustificationHeuristic::checkJustified(TNode n)
{
  return d_justified.find(n) != d_justified.end();
}

SatValue JustificationHeuristic::tryGetSatValue(Node n)
{
  Debug("decision") << "   "  << n << " has sat value " << " ";
  if(d_decisionEngine->hasSatLiteral(n) ) {
    Debug("decision") << d_decisionEngine->getSatValue(n) << std::endl;
    return d_decisionEngine->getSatValue(n);
  } else {
    Debug("decision") << "NO SAT LITERAL" << std::endl;
    return SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN;
  }//end of else
}

void JustificationHeuristic::computeITEs(TNode n, IteList &l)
{
  Trace("jh-ite") << " computeITEs( " << n << ", &l)\n";
  for(unsigned i=0; i<n.getNumChildren(); ++i) {
    SkolemMap::iterator it2 = d_iteAssertions.find(n[i]);
    if(it2 != d_iteAssertions.end()) {
      l.push_back(make_pair(n[i], it2->second));
      Assert(n[i].getNumChildren() == 0);
    }
    computeITEs(n[i], l);
  }
}

const JustificationHeuristic::IteList& JustificationHeuristic::getITEs(TNode n)
{
  IteCache::iterator it = d_iteCache.find(n);
  if(it != d_iteCache.end()) {
    return it->second;
  } else {
    // Compute the list of ITEs
    // TODO: optimize by avoiding multiple lookup for d_iteCache[n]
    d_iteCache[n] = IteList();
    computeITEs(n, d_iteCache[n]);
    return d_iteCache[n];
  }
}

bool JustificationHeuristic::findSplitterRec(TNode node, 
                                             SatValue desiredVal,
                                             SatLiteral* litDecision)
{
  Trace("jh-findSplitterRec") 
    << "findSplitterRec(" << node << ", " 
    << desiredVal << ", .. )" << std::endl; 

  /* Handle NOT as a special case */
  while (node.getKind() == kind::NOT) {
    desiredVal = invertValue(desiredVal);
    node = node[0];
  }

  if(Debug.isOn("decision")) {
    if(checkJustified(node))
      Debug("decision") << "  justified, returning" << std::endl; 
  }

  /* Base case */
  if (checkJustified(node)) {
    return false;
  }

#if defined CVC4_ASSERTIONS || defined CVC4_DEBUG
  // We don't always have a sat literal, so remember that. Will need
  // it for some assertions we make.
  bool litPresent = d_decisionEngine->hasSatLiteral(node);
  if(Debug.isOn("decision")) {
    if(!litPresent) {
      Debug("decision") << "no sat literal for this node" << std::endl;
    }
  }
  //Assert(litPresent); -- fails
#endif

  // Get value of sat literal for the node, if there is one
  SatValue litVal = tryGetSatValue(node);

  /* You'd better know what you want */
  Assert(desiredVal != SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN, "expected known value");

  /* Good luck, hope you can get what you want */
  // if(not (litVal == desiredVal || litVal == SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN)) {
  //   Warning() << "WARNING: IMPORTANT: Please look into this. Sat solver is asking for a decision" << std::endl
  //             << "when the assertion we are trying to justify is already unsat. OR there is a bug" << std::endl;
  //   GiveUpException();
  // }
  Assert(litVal == desiredVal || litVal == SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN,
         "invariant violated");

  /* What type of node is this */
  Kind k = node.getKind();	
  theory::TheoryId tId = theory::kindToTheoryId(k);

  /* Some debugging stuff */
  Debug("jh-findSplitterRec") << "kind = " << k << std::endl;
  Debug("jh-findSplitterRec") << "theoryId = " << tId << std::endl;
  Debug("jh-findSplitterRec") << "node = " << node << std::endl;
  Debug("jh-findSplitterRec") << "litVal = " << litVal << std::endl;

  /**
   * If not in theory of booleans, and not a "boolean" EQUAL (IFF),
   * then check if this is something to split-on.
   */
  if(tId != theory::THEORY_BOOL
     //      && !(k == kind::EQUAL && node[0].getType().isBoolean()) 
     ) {

    // if node has embedded ites -- which currently happens iff it got
    // replaced during ite removal -- then try to resolve that first
    const IteList& l = getITEs(node);
    Trace("jh-ite") << " ite size = " << l.size() << std::endl;
    /*d_visited.insert(node);*/
    for(IteList::const_iterator i = l.begin(); i != l.end(); ++i) {
      if(d_visited.find(i->first) == d_visited.end()) {
        d_visited.insert(i->first);
        Debug("jh-ite") << "jh-ite: adding visited " << i->first << std::endl;
        if(findSplitterRec(i->second, SAT_VALUE_TRUE, litDecision))
          return true;
        Debug("jh-ite") << "jh-ite: removing visited " << i->first << std::endl;
        d_visited.erase(i->first);
      } else {
        Debug("jh-ite") << "jh-ite: already visited " << i->first << std::endl;
      }
    }

    if(litVal != SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN) {
      setJustified(node);
      return false;
    } else {
      Assert(d_decisionEngine->hasSatLiteral(node));
      /* if(not d_decisionEngine->hasSatLiteral(node))
         throw GiveUpException(); */
      Assert(d_decisionEngine->hasSatLiteral(node));
      SatVariable v = d_decisionEngine->getSatLiteral(node).getSatVariable();
      *litDecision = SatLiteral(v, desiredVal != SAT_VALUE_TRUE );
      Trace("decision") << "decision " << *litDecision << std::endl;
      Trace("decision") << "Found something to split. Glad to be able to serve you." << std::endl;
      return true;
    }
  }

  SatValue valHard = SAT_VALUE_FALSE;
  switch (k) {

  case kind::CONST_BOOLEAN:
    Assert(node.getConst<bool>() == false || desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_TRUE);
    Assert(node.getConst<bool>() == true || desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_FALSE);
    setJustified(node);
    return false;

  case kind::AND:
    valHard = SAT_VALUE_TRUE;

  case kind::OR:
    if (desiredVal == valHard) {
      int n = node.getNumChildren();
      for(int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
        if (findSplitterRec(node[i], valHard, litDecision)) {
          return true;
        }
      }
      Assert(litPresent == false || litVal == valHard,
             "Output should be justified");
      setJustified(node);
      return false;
    }
    else {
      SatValue valEasy = invertValue(valHard);
      int n = node.getNumChildren();
      for(int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
        Debug("jh-findSplitterRec") << " node[i] = " << node[i] << " " 
                                 << tryGetSatValue(node[i]) << std::endl;
        if ( tryGetSatValue(node[i]) != valHard) {
          Debug("jh-findSplitterRec") << "hi"<< std::endl;
          if (findSplitterRec(node[i], valEasy, litDecision)) {
            return true;
          }
          Assert(litPresent == false || litVal == valEasy, "Output should be justified");
          setJustified(node);
          return false;
        }
      }
      if(Debug.isOn("jh-findSplitterRec")) {
        Debug("jh-findSplitterRec") << " * ** " << std::endl;
        Debug("jh-findSplitterRec") << node.getKind() << " "
                                    << node << std::endl;
        for(unsigned i = 0; i < node.getNumChildren(); ++i) 
        Debug("jh-findSplitterRec") << "child: " << tryGetSatValue(node[i]) 
                                    << std::endl;
        Debug("jh-findSplitterRec") << "node: " << tryGetSatValue(node)
                                    << std::endl;
      }
      Assert(false, "No controlling input found (2)");
    }
    break;

  case kind::IMPLIES:
    //throw GiveUpException();
    Assert(node.getNumChildren() == 2, "Expected 2 fanins");
    if (desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_FALSE) {
      if (findSplitterRec(node[0], SAT_VALUE_TRUE, litDecision)) {
        return true;
      }
      if (findSplitterRec(node[1], SAT_VALUE_FALSE, litDecision)) {
        return true;
      }
      Assert(litPresent == false || litVal == SAT_VALUE_FALSE, 
             "Output should be justified");
      setJustified(node);
      return false;
    }
    else {
      if (tryGetSatValue(node[0]) != SAT_VALUE_TRUE) {
        if (findSplitterRec(node[0], SAT_VALUE_FALSE, litDecision)) {
          return true;
        }
        Assert(litPresent == false || litVal == SAT_VALUE_TRUE, 
               "Output should be justified");
        setJustified(node);
        return false;
      }
      if (tryGetSatValue(node[1]) != SAT_VALUE_FALSE) {
        if (findSplitterRec(node[1], SAT_VALUE_TRUE, litDecision)) {
          return true;
        }
        Assert(litPresent == false || litVal == SAT_VALUE_TRUE, 
               "Output should be justified");
        setJustified(node);
        return false;
      }
      Assert(false, "No controlling input found (3)");
    }
    break;

  case kind::IFF: 
    //throw GiveUpException();
    {
    SatValue val = tryGetSatValue(node[0]);
    if (val != SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN) {
      if (findSplitterRec(node[0], val, litDecision)) {
        return true;
      }
      if (desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_FALSE) val = invertValue(val);

      if (findSplitterRec(node[1], val, litDecision)) {
        return true;
      }
      Assert(litPresent == false || litVal == desiredVal, 
             "Output should be justified");
      setJustified(node);
      return false;
    }
    else {
      val = tryGetSatValue(node[1]);
      if (val == SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN) val = SAT_VALUE_FALSE;
      if (desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_FALSE) val = invertValue(val);
      if (findSplitterRec(node[0], val, litDecision)) {
        return true;
      }
      Assert(false, "Unable to find controlling input (4)");
    }
    break;
  }
    
  case kind::XOR:
    //throw GiveUpException();
    {
    SatValue val = tryGetSatValue(node[0]);
    if (val != SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN) {
      if (findSplitterRec(node[0], val, litDecision)) {
        return true;
      }
      if (desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_TRUE) val = invertValue(val);

      if (findSplitterRec(node[1], val, litDecision)) {
        return true;
      }
      Assert(litPresent == false || litVal == desiredVal, 
             "Output should be justified");
      setJustified(node);
      return false;
    }
    else {
      SatValue val = tryGetSatValue(node[1]);
      if (val == SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN) val = SAT_VALUE_FALSE;
      if (desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_TRUE) val = invertValue(val);
      if (findSplitterRec(node[0], val, litDecision)) {
        return true;
      }
      Assert(false, "Unable to find controlling input (5)");
    }
    break;
  }

  case kind::ITE: {
    //[0]: if, [1]: then, [2]: else
    SatValue ifVal = tryGetSatValue(node[0]);
    if (ifVal == SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN) {
      
      // are we better off trying false? if not, try true
      SatValue ifDesiredVal = 
        (tryGetSatValue(node[2]) == desiredVal ||
	 tryGetSatValue(node[1]) == invertValue(desiredVal))
	? SAT_VALUE_FALSE : SAT_VALUE_TRUE;

      if(findSplitterRec(node[0], ifDesiredVal, litDecision)) {
	return true;
      }
      Assert(false, "No controlling input found (6)");
    } else {

      // Try to justify 'if'
      if (findSplitterRec(node[0], ifVal, litDecision)) {
	return true;
      }

      // If that was successful, we need to go into only one of 'then'
      // or 'else'
      int ch = (ifVal == SAT_VALUE_TRUE) ? 1 : 2;
      int chVal = tryGetSatValue(node[ch]);
      if( (chVal == SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN || chVal == desiredVal)
	  && findSplitterRec(node[ch], desiredVal, litDecision) ) {
	return true;
      }
    }
    Assert(litPresent == false || litVal == desiredVal,
	   "Output should be justified");
    setJustified(node);
    return false;
  }

  default:
    Assert(false, "Unexpected Boolean operator");
    break;
  }//end of switch(k)

  Unreachable();
}/* findRecSplit method */
generated by cgit on debian on lair
contact matthew@masot.net with questions or feedback