summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/decision/justification_heuristic.cpp
blob: 6ed331b0aaacd109f47c2713edccb6eeacba1f1e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
/*********************                                                        */
/*! \file justification_heuristic.cpp
 ** \verbatim
 ** Original author: Kshitij Bansal
 ** Major contributors: none
 ** Minor contributors (to current version): Morgan Deters
 ** This file is part of the CVC4 project.
 ** Copyright (c) 2009-2013  New York University and The University of Iowa
 ** See the file COPYING in the top-level source directory for licensing
 ** information.\endverbatim
 **
 ** \brief Justification heuristic for decision making
 **
 ** A ATGP-inspired justification-based decision heuristic. This code is based
 ** on the CVC3 implementation of the same heuristic -- note below.
 **
 ** It needs access to the simplified but non-clausal formula.
 **/

#include "justification_heuristic.h"

#include "expr/node_manager.h"
#include "expr/kind.h"
#include "theory/rewriter.h"
#include "util/ite_removal.h"


using namespace CVC4;

JustificationHeuristic::JustificationHeuristic(CVC4::DecisionEngine* de,
                                               context::UserContext *uc,
                                               context::Context *c):
  ITEDecisionStrategy(de, c),
  d_justified(c),
  d_prvsIndex(c, 0),
  d_helfulness("decision::jh::helpfulness", 0),
  d_giveup("decision::jh::giveup", 0),
  d_timestat("decision::jh::time"),
  d_assertions(uc),
  d_iteAssertions(uc),
  d_iteCache(uc),
  d_visited(),
  d_visitedComputeITE(),
  d_curDecision() {
  StatisticsRegistry::registerStat(&d_helfulness);
  StatisticsRegistry::registerStat(&d_giveup);
  StatisticsRegistry::registerStat(&d_timestat);
  Trace("decision") << "Justification heuristic enabled" << std::endl;
}

JustificationHeuristic::~JustificationHeuristic() {
  StatisticsRegistry::unregisterStat(&d_helfulness);
  StatisticsRegistry::unregisterStat(&d_giveup);
  StatisticsRegistry::unregisterStat(&d_timestat);
}

CVC4::prop::SatLiteral JustificationHeuristic::getNext(bool &stopSearch) {
  Trace("decision") << "JustificationHeuristic::getNext()" << std::endl;
  TimerStat::CodeTimer codeTimer(d_timestat);

  d_visited.clear();

  if(Trace.isOn("justified")) {
    for(JustifiedSet::key_iterator i = d_justified.key_begin();
        i != d_justified.key_end(); ++i) {
      TNode n = *i;
      SatLiteral l = d_decisionEngine->hasSatLiteral(n) ?
        d_decisionEngine->getSatLiteral(n) : -1;
      SatValue v = tryGetSatValue(n);
      Trace("justified") <<"{ "<<l<<"}" << n <<": "<<v << std::endl;
    }
  }

  for(unsigned i = d_prvsIndex; i < d_assertions.size(); ++i) {
    Debug("decision") << "---" << std::endl << d_assertions[i] << std::endl;

    // Sanity check: if it was false, aren't we inconsistent?
    // Commenting out. See bug 374. In short, to do with how CNF stream works.
    // Assert( tryGetSatValue(d_assertions[i]) != SAT_VALUE_FALSE);

    SatValue desiredVal = SAT_VALUE_TRUE;
    SatLiteral litDecision;

    litDecision = findSplitter(d_assertions[i], desiredVal);

    if(litDecision != undefSatLiteral) {
      d_prvsIndex = i;
      Trace("decision") << "jh: spliting on " << litDecision << std::endl;
      return litDecision;
    }
  }

  Trace("decision") << "jh: Nothing to split on " << std::endl;

#if defined CVC4_DEBUG
  bool alljustified = true;
  for(unsigned i = 0 ; i < d_assertions.size() && alljustified ; ++i) {
    TNode curass = d_assertions[i];
    while(curass.getKind() == kind::NOT)
      curass = curass[0];
    alljustified &= checkJustified(curass);

    if(Debug.isOn("decision")) {
      if(!checkJustified(curass))
        Debug("decision") << "****** Not justified [i="<<i<<"]: " 
                          << d_assertions[i] << std::endl;
    }
  }
  Assert(alljustified);
#endif

  // SAT solver can stop...
  stopSearch = true;
  d_decisionEngine->setResult(SAT_VALUE_TRUE);
  return prop::undefSatLiteral;
}


inline void computeXorIffDesiredValues
(Kind k, SatValue desiredVal, SatValue &desiredVal1, SatValue &desiredVal2)
{
  Assert(k == kind::IFF || k == kind::XOR);

  bool shouldInvert =
    (desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_TRUE && k == kind::IFF) ||
    (desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_FALSE && k == kind::XOR);

  if(desiredVal1 == SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN &&
     desiredVal2 == SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN) {
    // CHOICE: pick one of them arbitarily
    desiredVal1 = SAT_VALUE_FALSE;
  }

  if(desiredVal2 == SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN) {
    desiredVal2 = shouldInvert ? invertValue(desiredVal1) : desiredVal1;
  } else if(desiredVal1 == SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN) {
    desiredVal1 = shouldInvert ? invertValue(desiredVal2) : desiredVal2;
  }
}



void JustificationHeuristic::addAssertions
(const std::vector<Node> &assertions,
 unsigned assertionsEnd,
 IteSkolemMap iteSkolemMap) {

  Trace("decision")
    << "JustificationHeuristic::addAssertions()" 
    << " size = " << assertions.size()
    << " assertionsEnd = " << assertionsEnd
    << std::endl;

  // Save the 'real' assertions locally
  for(unsigned i = 0; i < assertionsEnd; ++i)
    d_assertions.push_back(assertions[i]);

  // Save mapping between ite skolems and ite assertions
  for(IteSkolemMap::iterator i = iteSkolemMap.begin();
      i != iteSkolemMap.end(); ++i) {

    Trace("decision::jh::ite") 
      << " jh-ite: " << (i->first) << " maps to "
      << assertions[(i->second)] << std::endl;
    Assert(i->second >= assertionsEnd && i->second < assertions.size());

    d_iteAssertions[i->first] = assertions[i->second];
  }
}

SatLiteral JustificationHeuristic::findSplitter(TNode node,
                                                SatValue desiredVal)
{
  d_curDecision = undefSatLiteral;
  if(findSplitterRec(node, desiredVal)) {
    ++d_helfulness;
  } 
  return d_curDecision;
}


void JustificationHeuristic::setJustified(TNode n)
{
  d_justified.insert(n);
}

bool JustificationHeuristic::checkJustified(TNode n)
{
  return d_justified.find(n) != d_justified.end();
}

SatValue JustificationHeuristic::tryGetSatValue(Node n)
{
  Debug("decision") << "   "  << n << " has sat value " << " ";
  if(d_decisionEngine->hasSatLiteral(n) ) {
    Debug("decision") << d_decisionEngine->getSatValue(n) << std::endl;
    return d_decisionEngine->getSatValue(n);
  } else {
    Debug("decision") << "NO SAT LITERAL" << std::endl;
    return SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN;
  }//end of else
}

JustificationHeuristic::IteList
JustificationHeuristic::getITEs(TNode n)
{
  IteCache::iterator it = d_iteCache.find(n);
  if(it != d_iteCache.end()) {
    return (*it).second;
  } else {
    // Compute the list of ITEs
    // TODO: optimize by avoiding multiple lookup for d_iteCache[n]
    d_visitedComputeITE.clear();
    IteList ilist;
    computeITEs(n, ilist);
    d_iteCache.insert(n, ilist);
    return ilist;
  }
}

void JustificationHeuristic::computeITEs(TNode n, IteList &l)
{
  Trace("decision::jh::ite") << " computeITEs( " << n << ", &l)\n";
  d_visitedComputeITE.insert(n);
  for(unsigned i=0; i<n.getNumChildren(); ++i) {
    SkolemMap::iterator it2 = d_iteAssertions.find(n[i]);
    if(it2 != d_iteAssertions.end()) {
      l.push_back(make_pair(n[i], (*it2).second));
      Assert(n[i].getNumChildren() == 0);
    }
    if(d_visitedComputeITE.find(n[i]) ==
         d_visitedComputeITE.end()) {
      computeITEs(n[i], l);
    }
  }
}

bool JustificationHeuristic::findSplitterRec(TNode node, 
                                             SatValue desiredVal)
{
  /**
   * Main idea
   *
   * Given a boolean formula "node", the goal is to try to make it
   * evaluate to "desiredVal" (true/false). for instance if "node" is a OR
   * formula we want to make it evaluate to true, we'd like one of the
   * children to be true. this is done recursively.
   */

  Trace("decision::jh") 
    << "findSplitterRec(" << node << ", " 
    << desiredVal << ", .. )" << std::endl; 

  /* Handle NOT as a special case */
  while (node.getKind() == kind::NOT) {
    desiredVal = invertValue(desiredVal);
    node = node[0];
  }

  /* Base case */
  if (checkJustified(node)) {
    Debug("decision::jh") << "  justified, returning" << std::endl; 
    return false;
  }

#if defined CVC4_ASSERTIONS || defined CVC4_DEBUG
  // We don't always have a sat literal, so remember that. Will need
  // it for some assertions we make.
  bool litPresent = d_decisionEngine->hasSatLiteral(node);
  if(Debug.isOn("decision")) {
    if(!litPresent) {
      Debug("decision") << "no sat literal for this node" << std::endl;
    }
  }
#endif

  // Get value of sat literal for the node, if there is one
  SatValue litVal = tryGetSatValue(node);

  /* You'd better know what you want */
  Assert(desiredVal != SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN, "expected known value");

  /* Good luck, hope you can get what you want */
  // See bug 374
  // Assert(litVal == desiredVal || litVal == SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN,
  //       "invariant violated");

  /* What type of node is this */
  Kind k = node.getKind();	
  theory::TheoryId tId = theory::kindToTheoryId(k);

  /* Some debugging stuff */
  Debug("decision::jh") << "kind = " << k << std::endl
                        << "theoryId = " << tId << std::endl
                        << "node = " << node << std::endl
                        << "litVal = " << litVal << std::endl;

  /**
   * If not in theory of booleans, check if this is something to split-on.
   */
  if(tId != theory::THEORY_BOOL) {
    // if node has embedded ites, resolve that first
    if(handleEmbeddedITEs(node))
      return true;

    if(litVal != SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN) {
      Assert(litVal == desiredVal);
      setJustified(node);
      return false;
    } 
    else {
      Assert(d_decisionEngine->hasSatLiteral(node));
      SatVariable v = 
        d_decisionEngine->getSatLiteral(node).getSatVariable();
      d_curDecision = SatLiteral(v, desiredVal != SAT_VALUE_TRUE );
      return true;
    }
  }

  bool ret = false;
  switch (k) {

  case kind::CONST_BOOLEAN:
    Assert(node.getConst<bool>() == false || desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_TRUE);
    Assert(node.getConst<bool>() == true  || desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_FALSE);
    break;

  case kind::AND:
    if (desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_FALSE)
      ret = handleAndOrEasy(node, desiredVal);
    else
      ret = handleAndOrHard(node, desiredVal);
    break;

  case kind::OR:
    if (desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_FALSE)
      ret = handleAndOrHard(node, desiredVal);
    else
      ret = handleAndOrEasy(node, desiredVal);
    break;

  case kind::IMPLIES:
    if (desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_FALSE)
      ret = handleBinaryHard(node[0], SAT_VALUE_TRUE,
                             node[1], SAT_VALUE_FALSE);

    else
      ret = handleBinaryEasy(node[0], SAT_VALUE_FALSE,
                             node[1], SAT_VALUE_TRUE);
    break;

  case kind::XOR:
  case kind::IFF: {
    SatValue desiredVal1 = tryGetSatValue(node[0]);
    SatValue desiredVal2 = tryGetSatValue(node[1]);
    computeXorIffDesiredValues(k, desiredVal, desiredVal1, desiredVal2);
    ret = handleBinaryHard(node[0], desiredVal1,
                           node[1], desiredVal2);
    break;
  }

  case kind::ITE:
    ret = handleITE(node, desiredVal);
    break;

  default:
    Assert(false, "Unexpected Boolean operator");
    break;
  }//end of switch(k)

  if(ret == false) {
    Assert(litPresent == false || litVal ==  desiredVal,
           "Output should be justified");
    setJustified(node);
  }
  return ret;
}/* findRecSplit method */

bool JustificationHeuristic::handleAndOrEasy(TNode node,
                                             SatValue desiredVal)
{
  Assert( (node.getKind() == kind::AND and desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_FALSE) or 
          (node.getKind() == kind::OR  and desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_TRUE) );

  int numChildren = node.getNumChildren();
  SatValue desiredValInverted = invertValue(desiredVal);
  for(int i = 0; i < numChildren; ++i)
    if ( tryGetSatValue(node[i]) != desiredValInverted )
      return findSplitterRec(node[i], desiredVal);
  Assert(false, "handleAndOrEasy: No controlling input found");
  return false;
}

bool JustificationHeuristic::handleAndOrHard(TNode node,
                                             SatValue desiredVal) {
  Assert( (node.getKind() == kind::AND and desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_TRUE) or 
          (node.getKind() == kind::OR  and desiredVal == SAT_VALUE_FALSE) );

  int numChildren = node.getNumChildren();
  for(int i = 0; i < numChildren; ++i)
    if (findSplitterRec(node[i], desiredVal))
      return true;
  return false;
}

bool JustificationHeuristic::handleBinaryEasy(TNode node1,
                                              SatValue desiredVal1,
                                              TNode node2,
                                              SatValue desiredVal2)
{
  if ( tryGetSatValue(node1) != invertValue(desiredVal1) )
    return findSplitterRec(node1, desiredVal1);
  if ( tryGetSatValue(node2) != invertValue(desiredVal2) )
    return findSplitterRec(node2, desiredVal2);
  Assert(false, "handleBinaryEasy: No controlling input found");
  return false;
}

bool JustificationHeuristic::handleBinaryHard(TNode node1,
                                              SatValue desiredVal1,
                                              TNode node2,
                                              SatValue desiredVal2)
{
  if( findSplitterRec(node1, desiredVal1) )
    return true;
  return findSplitterRec(node2, desiredVal2);
}

bool JustificationHeuristic::handleITE(TNode node, SatValue desiredVal)
{
  Debug("decision::jh") << " handleITE (" << node << ", "
                              << desiredVal << std::endl;

  //[0]: if, [1]: then, [2]: else
  SatValue ifVal = tryGetSatValue(node[0]);
  if (ifVal == SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN) {
      
    // are we better off trying false? if not, try true [CHOICE]
    SatValue ifDesiredVal = 
      (tryGetSatValue(node[2]) == desiredVal ||
       tryGetSatValue(node[1]) == invertValue(desiredVal))
      ? SAT_VALUE_FALSE : SAT_VALUE_TRUE;

    if(findSplitterRec(node[0], ifDesiredVal)) return true;
    
    Assert(false, "No controlling input found (6)");
  } else {
    // Try to justify 'if'
    if(findSplitterRec(node[0], ifVal)) return true;

    // If that was successful, we need to go into only one of 'then'
    // or 'else'
    int ch = (ifVal == SAT_VALUE_TRUE) ? 1 : 2;

    // STALE code: remove after tests or mar 2013, whichever earlier
    // int chVal = tryGetSatValue(node[ch]);
    // Assert(chVal == SAT_VALUE_UNKNOWN || chVal == desiredVal);
    // end STALE code: remove

    if( findSplitterRec(node[ch], desiredVal) ) {
      return true;
    }
  }// else (...ifVal...)
  return false;
}

bool JustificationHeuristic::handleEmbeddedITEs(TNode node)
{
  const IteList l = getITEs(node);
  Trace("decision::jh::ite") << " ite size = " << l.size() << std::endl;

  for(IteList::const_iterator i = l.begin(); i != l.end(); ++i) {
    if(d_visited.find((*i).first) == d_visited.end()) {
      d_visited.insert((*i).first);
      if(findSplitterRec((*i).second, SAT_VALUE_TRUE))
        return true;
      d_visited.erase((*i).first);
    }
  }
  return false;
}
generated by cgit on debian on lair
contact matthew@masot.net with questions or feedback