From 0ddae476216452696dbb809173afc2fb440a7c57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Haniel Barbosa Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 01:43:14 -0300 Subject: using NOT_NOT_ELIM rather than macros to do double-neg elimination (#5261) --- src/prop/proof_cnf_stream.cpp | 22 +++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/prop') diff --git a/src/prop/proof_cnf_stream.cpp b/src/prop/proof_cnf_stream.cpp index 92212ded0..c7dd288af 100644 --- a/src/prop/proof_cnf_stream.cpp +++ b/src/prop/proof_cnf_stream.cpp @@ -110,13 +110,10 @@ void ProofCnfStream::convertAndAssert(TNode node, bool negated) // track double negation elimination if (negated) { - d_proof.addStep(node[0], - PfRule::MACRO_SR_PRED_TRANSFORM, - {node.notNode()}, - {node[0]}); - Trace("cnf") << "ProofCnfStream::convertAndAssert: " - "MACRO_SR_PRED_TRANSFORM added norm " - << node[0] << "\n"; + d_proof.addStep(node[0], PfRule::NOT_NOT_ELIM, {node.notNode()}, {}); + Trace("cnf") + << "ProofCnfStream::convertAndAssert: NOT_NOT_ELIM added norm " + << node[0] << "\n"; } convertAndAssert(node[0], !negated); break; @@ -139,13 +136,12 @@ void ProofCnfStream::convertAndAssert(TNode node, bool negated) { // track double negation elimination // (not (not n)) - // -------------- MACRO_SR_PRED_TRANSFORM + // -------------- NOT_NOT_ELIM // n - d_proof.addStep( - nnode, PfRule::MACRO_SR_PRED_TRANSFORM, {node.notNode()}, {nnode}); - Trace("cnf") << "ProofCnfStream::convertAndAssert: " - "MACRO_SR_PRED_TRANSFORM added norm " - << nnode << "\n"; + d_proof.addStep(nnode, PfRule::NOT_NOT_ELIM, {node.notNode()}, {}); + Trace("cnf") + << "ProofCnfStream::convertAndAssert: NOT_NOT_ELIM added norm " + << nnode << "\n"; } if (added) { -- cgit v1.2.3