| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resource manager will be owned by SmtEngine in the future. This passes the resource manager cached by SmtEnginePrivate to the PropEngine created by SmtEngine instead of using the global pointer. It also makes a few preprocessing passes use the resource manager they already have access to and should use.
|
|
Towards disentangling Options / NodeManager / SmtEngine.
This PR removes options --use-theory=NAME and --replay/--replay-log. Both of these options are highly complex, unused, and lead to complications when implementing the way options and our build system work.
The first is motivated by making TheoryEngine use an "alternate" theory, which appears to e.g. make it so that TheoryIdl could entirely replace TheoryArith. I believe this is too heavy handed of a solution: there should a consistent TheoryArith class, and options should be used to enable/disable alternate modules within it.
The second attempts to replay low level decisions from the SAT solver. It is documented as not working (in 1.0). I do not believe this is worth salvaging.
It also removes the solver in src/theory/idl, which cannot be enabled after this commit.
|
|
Fixes #4151. Commit e9f4cec2cad02e270747759223090c16b9d2d44c fixed how
`(reset-assertions)` is handled by destroying and recreating the
`PropEngine` owned by `SmtEngine`. When unsat cores are enabled,
creating a `PropEngine` triggers the creation of a SAT proof and a CNF
proof. In the `ProofManager`, we had assertions that checked that those
kinds of proofs were only created once, which is not true anymore. This
commit removes the assertions, cleans up the memory management in
`ProofManager` to use `std::unique_ptr` and makes all the
`ProofManager::init*` methods non-static for consistency.
The commit also fixes an additional issue that I encountered while
testing the fix: When creating the new `PropEngine`, we were not
asserting `true` and `(not false)`, which lead to an error if we tried
to get the unsat core after a `(reset-assertion)` command and we had
asserted `(assert false)`. The commit fixes this by asserting `true` and
`(not false)` in the constructor of `PropEngine`.
The regression test is an extension of the example in #4151 and covers
both issues.
|
|
Fixes #3814. `CnfProof` has a stack of assertions that are being
converted to clauses. `CnfStream::ensureLiteral()` can result in clauses
being added to the SAT solver. When adding a clause, we require an
assertion that can be associated with the clause
(https://github.com/CVC4/CVC4/blob/ba6ade0fc3f4cd339885652bb9bf5c87113c498d/src/prop/minisat/core/Solver.cc#L471-L476).
However, in the issue that was reported, the stack was empty, resulting
in an assertion failure. This commit fixes the issue by setting the
current assertion to be the null node when a literal is being ensured
(and changing the proof code to update the assertion associated with a
literal if it is currently null). This should be ok since the clauses
are not inputs or lemmas (if they are, the assertion associated with the
clause will be updated).
|
|
Calling (reset-assertions) in start mode was not handled correctly.
Additionally, when calling (check-sat) after (reset-assertions) after a
(check-sat) call that answered unsat, we answered unsat instead of sat.
This cleans up and fixes reset-assertions) handling.
|
|
Fixes #3959. It can happen that we generate a lemma that results in a
unit clause that matches a unit clause that was added as an input.
However, we are asserting that a unit clause can only be registered as
either one of them. This commit fixes the issue by only registering a
unit clause from a lemma if it is not already satisfied. I chose this
fix because the existing code doesn't seem to do anything (in terms of
solving) for the case where we have a unit clause that is already
satisfied because of an input unit clause.
|
|
This is in preparation of fixing the issue we currently have with
reset-assertions. This also removes a competition hack for QF_LRA.
|
|
This reverts commit bbba915f44f9e75eaa6238a10ba667643dacb00b.
|
|
This is in preparation of fixing the issue we currently have with reset-assertions.
This also removes a competition hack for QF_LRA.
|
|
Fixes all -Wshadow warnings and enables the -Wshadow compile flag globally.
Co-authored-by: Clark Barrett <barrett@cs.stanford.edu>
Co-authored-by: Andres Noetzli <andres.noetzli@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aina Niemetz <aina.niemetz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Ozdemir <aozdemir@hmc.edu>
Co-authored-by: makaimann <makaim@stanford.edu>
Co-authored-by: yoni206 <yoni206@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Reynolds <andrew.j.reynolds@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: AleksandarZeljic <zeljic@stanford.edu>
Co-authored-by: Caleb Donovick <cdonovick@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amalee <amaleewilson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Scott Kovach <dskovach@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: ntsis <nekuna@gmail.com>
|
|
(#3846)
|
|
Commit 1c09572e0e2031519a103caa2a4af0d9bd34a9c5 removed the portfolio
build but there were some leftovers. This commit removes them.
|
|
(#3788)
PR #2871 added trace tags for dumping the decision tree in org-mode format. However, it only dumped theory propagations/conflicts. This could be confusing because it would appear to backtrack without reaching a conflict (but actually the conflict was at the propositional level). This commit also adds dumping of boolean propagations and conflicts.
|
|
This commit adds statistics for all resource steps. A resource statistic is incremented by 1 if the resource is spent (via `spendResource`).
Fixes #3751.
|
|
This commit adds support for code generation of options with modes (enums). From now on option enums can be specified in the corresponding *.toml files without the need of extra code. All option enums are now in the options namespace.
|
|
This would add tracing options to print the decision tree in [org-mode](https://orgmode.org/) format which can be viewed with emacs or [vim-orgmode](https://github.com/jceb/vim-orgmode).
In the raw format, the number of asterisks denote the decision level of a decision, and within a propagation node, the number of spaces denote the level. Most viewers render the asterisks as indented bullets.
There are some options for controlling verbosity:
`dtview` - prints the decisions (basic option)
`dtview::command` - also prints smt-lib commands as they're issued
`dtview::conflict` - also prints conflicts
`dtview::prop` - also prints propagations
Example usage:
`cvc4 -t dtview -t dtview::command -t dtview::conflict -t dtview::prop <example smt2 file> &> example-trace.org`
The resulting file when opened with an org-mode viewer has collapsible nodes, where "..." marks a node with children.
|
|
This commit enables compiler warnings for implicit fallthroughs in
switch statements that are not explicitly marked as such. The commit
introduces a new macro `CVC4_FALLTHROUGH` that can be used to indicate
that a fallthrough is intentional. The commit fixes existing warnings
and a bug in the arithmetic rewriter for `abs` (the bug likely couldn't
be triggered easily because we rewrite `abs` to an `ite` while expanding
definitions).
To have the new macro also available in the parser, the commit changes
`src/base/check.h` to be visible to the parser (it includes
`cvc4_private_library.h` now instead of `cvc4_private.h`).
|
|
Fixes #971.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Removes incremental API check (#3011)
* Fixes toSatValueLit to use the new semantics of CaDiCaL's val()
Fixes #3011
|
|
* improved proof production statistics
This commit creates new statistics which will help us understand what is
so expensive about proof production.
There are already statistics for:
* Net time spent building/printing the LFSC proof.
* Size of the LFSC proof.
This commit adds statistics for:
* The time cost of DRAT optimization:
* net time
* tool time (drat-trim)
* clause matching time (matching core clauses with input clauses)
* Non-trivial because drat-trim can (and does) dedup and reorder
literals
* The advantage of DRAT optimization (proof/formula size before/after)
* The time cost of DRAT translation [to LRAT or ER] (net time, tool time)
* The time cost of skeleton traversal
* The time cost of printing declatations
* The time cost of printing CNF proofs
* The time cost of printing theory lemmas
* The time cost of printing final UNSAT proof.
There is a method, toStream, which is responsible for much of proof
production. The whole method was timed, but subsections were not. The
timings above consider subsections of it.
I also wanted to better understand the cost of DRAT optimization and
translation.
* [BV Proof] Optimize DRAT optimization
tldr: I made a bad data-structure/algorithm choice when implementing
part of DRAT/CNF-optimization, which consumed **a lot** of time on some
bechmarks. This commit fixes that choice.
Long Version:
Set-Keyed Maps Considered Harmful
=================================
Algorithmic Problem
-------------------
The DRAT optimization process spits out a unsatifiable core of the CNF.
The clauses in the core are all from the original formula, but their
literals may have been reordered and deduplicated. We must match the
old clauses with new ones, so we know which old clauses are in the core.
Old (BAD) Solution
------------------
Before I didn't really think about this process very much. I built a
solution in which clauses were canonically represented by hash sets of
literals, and made a hash map from canonical clauses to clause indices
into the original CNF.
Problem With Old Solution
-------------------------
In hindsight this was a bad idea. First, it required a new hash set to
be heap-allocated for every clause in the CNF. Second, the map lookups
required set-hashes (reasonable -- linear time, once) and hash-set
equality (not reasonable -- quadratic time, multiple times) on every
lookup.
New Solution
------------
The ideal solution is probably to have the map from clauses to clause
ids be something like a trie. STL doesn't have a trie, but representing
clauses as sorted, deduped vectors of literal in a tree based on
lexicographical comparison is pretty closed to this. On randomly chosen
examples it seems to be a huge improvement over the old
map-keyed-by-sets solution, and I'm in the process of running a full set
of bechmarks.
Also, we store pointers to the clauses already stored elsewhere in the
proof, instead of allocating new memory for them.
Future Work
-----------
It may also be reasonable to do a hash map of sorted, deduped, vector
clauses. I haven't tried this, yet (there's a TODO in the code).
* Update src/proof/clausal_bitvector_proof.h
Thanks andres!
Co-Authored-By: Andres Noetzli <andres.noetzli@gmail.com>
* Respond to Andres' Review: better use of CodeTimer
* Removed commented code (Andres)
|
|
This commit adds support for eager bit-blasting with CaDiCaL on
incremental benchmarks. Since not all CaDiCaL versions support
incremental solving, the commit adds a CMake check that checks whether
`CaDiCaL::Solver::assume()` exists.
Note: The check uses `check_cxx_source_compiles`, which is not very
elegant but I could not find a better solution (e.g.
`check_cxx_symbol_exists()` does not seem to support methods in classes
and `check_struct_has_member()` only seems to support data members).
|
|
Fixes 2887.
|
|
* SatClauseHashFunction
Added to the same file as SatLiteralHashFunction.
* clang-format
Thanks Andres!
|
|
|
|
PR #2786 changed `CryptoMinisatSolver::addClause()` to register clauses
with the bit-vector proof if proofs are turned on. The new code
requested the `ProofManager` even when proofs were turned off, which
made the `eager-inc-cryptominisat.smt2` regression and our nightlies
fail. This commit guards the access to the `ProofManager`, restoring the
semantics of the original code when proofs are turned off.
|
|
* [DRAT] ClausalBitvectorProof
Created a class, `ClausalBitvectorProof`, which represents a bitvector
proof of UNSAT using an underlying clausal technique (DRAT, LRAT, etc)
It fits into the `BitvectorProof` class hierarchy like this:
```
BitvectorProof
/ \
/ \
ClausalBitvectorProof ResolutionBitvectorProof
```
This change is a painful one because all of the following BV subsystems
referenced ResolutionBitvectorProof (subsequently RBVP) or
BitvectorProof (subsequently BVP):
* CnfStream
* SatSolver (specifically the BvSatSolver)
* CnfProof
* TheoryProof
* TheoryBV
* Both bitblasters
And in particular, ResolutionBitvectorProof, the CnfStream, and the
SatSolvers were tightly coupled.
This means that references to and interactions with (R)BVP were
pervasive.
Nevertheless, an SMT developer must persist.
The change summary:
* Create a subclass of BVP, called ClausalBitvectorProof, which has
most methods stubbed out.
* Make a some modifications to BVP and ResolutionBitvectorProof as the
natural division of labor between the different classes becomes
clear.
* Go through all the components in the first list and try to figure
out which kind of BVP they should **actually** be interacting with,
and how. Make tweaks accordingly.
* Add a hook from CryptoMinisat which pipes the produced DRAT proof
into the new ClausalBitvectorProof.
* Add a debug statement to ClausalBitvectorProof which parses and
prints that DRAT proof, for testing purposes.
Test:
* `make check` to verify that we didn't break any old stuff, including
lazy BB, and eager BB when using bvminisat.
* `cvc4 --dump-proofs --bv-sat-solver=cryptominisat --bitblast=eager
-d bv::clausal test/regress/regress0/bv/ackermann2.smt2`, and see that
1. It crashed with "Unimplemented"
2. Right before that it prints out the (textual) DRAT proof.
* Remove 2 unneeded methods
* Missed a rename
* Typos
Thanks Andres!
Co-Authored-By: alex-ozdemir <aozdemir@hmc.edu>
* Address Andres comments
* Reorder members of TBitblaster
|
|
* Split BitvectorProof into a sub/superclass
The superclass contains general printing knowledge.
The subclass contains CNF or Resolution-specific knowledge.
* Renames & code moves
* Nits cleaned in prep for PR
* Moved CNF-proof from ResolutionBitVectorProof to BitVectorProof
Since DRAT BV proofs will also contain a CNF-proof, the CNF proof should
be stored in `BitVectorProof`.
* Unique pointers, comments, and code movement.
Adjusted the distribution of code between BVP and RBVP.
Notably, put the CNF proof in BVP because it isn't
resolution-specific.
Added comments to the headers of both files -- mostly BVP.
Changed two owned pointers into unique_ptr.
BVP's pointer to a CNF proof
RBVP's pointer to a resolution proof
BVP: `BitVectorProof`
RBVP: `ResolutionBitVectorProof`
* clang-format
* Undo manual copyright modification
* s/superclass/base class/
Co-Authored-By: alex-ozdemir <aozdemir@hmc.edu>
* make LFSCBitVectorProof::printOwnedSort public
* Andres's Comments
Mostly cleaning up (or trying to clean up) includes.
* Cleaned up one header cycle
However, this only allowed me to move the forward-decl, not eliminate
it, because there were actually two underlying include cycles that the
forward-decl solved.
* Added single _s to header gaurds
* Fix Class name in debug output
Credits to Andres
Co-Authored-By: alex-ozdemir <aozdemir@hmc.edu>
* Reordered methods in BitVectorProof per original ordering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sources of all previous libraries are now added to libcvc4 and built as
libcvc4. This removes circular dependencies between libcvc4 and libexpr.
Further, we now only have one parser library and don't build additional
libraries for each language.
|
|
|
|
TODO: cvc4autoconfig.h
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C++11 supports explicitly deleting functions that should not be used
(explictly or implictly), e.g. copy or assignment constructors. We were
previously using the CVC4_UNDEFINED macro that used a compiler-specific
attribute. The C++11 feature should be more portable.
|
|
|
|
Eager incremental solving is achieved via solving under assumptions. As soon as incremental and eager bit-blasting is enabled, assertions are passed to the SAT solver as assumptions rather than assertions. This requires the eager SAT solver to support incremental solving, which is currently only supported by CryptoMiniSat.
|
|
|
|
Fixes issue #2137. CnfProof has a stack of assertions that are being
converted to clauses. Previously, it could happen that while an
assertion was being added, TheoryProxy::explainPropagation() would be
called from Solver::reason() and push an assertion to the stack that was
then not removed. This lead to a clause id of the assertion being
associated with the explanation instead, which in turn could lead to a
wrong unsat core. This commit identifies two cases where
TheoryProxy::explainPropagation() is called without cleaning up the
assertion stack afterwards. It also adds an assertion that the assertion
stack must be empty when we are getting the unsat core.
|
|
In MiniSat's analyze(), we were taking a reference of a clause that
could be invalidated by a call to resolveOutUnit(). resolveOutUnit() can
lead to allocation of clauses which in turn can lead to clauses being
reallocated, making the reference stale. The commit encloses the
reference in a code block that makes the lifetime of the reference more
obvious and removes uses of the potentially stale reference.
|
|
|
|
This commit implements a workaround for computing unsat cores while
doing incremental solving to address #1349. Currently, our resolution
proofs do not handle clauses with a lower-than-assertion-level correctly
because the resolution proofs for them get removed when popping the
context but the SAT solver keeps using them. The workaround changes the
behavior of the SAT solver to add clauses always at the current level if
incremental solving and unsat cores are enabled. This makes sure that
all learned clauses are removed when we pop below the level that they
were learned at. This may degrade performance because the SAT solver has
to relearn clauses.
|
