diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/theory/arrays/theory_arrays.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/theory/arrays/theory_arrays.cpp | 182 |
1 files changed, 52 insertions, 130 deletions
diff --git a/src/theory/arrays/theory_arrays.cpp b/src/theory/arrays/theory_arrays.cpp index 3adcd4f49..603dc9639 100644 --- a/src/theory/arrays/theory_arrays.cpp +++ b/src/theory/arrays/theory_arrays.cpp @@ -23,9 +23,6 @@ #include "expr/node_algorithm.h" #include "options/arrays_options.h" #include "options/smt_options.h" -#include "proof/array_proof.h" -#include "proof/proof_manager.h" -#include "proof/theory_proof.h" #include "smt/command.h" #include "smt/logic_exception.h" #include "smt/smt_statistics_registry.h" @@ -111,7 +108,6 @@ TheoryArrays::TheoryArrays(context::Context* c, d_readTableContext(new context::Context()), d_arrayMerges(c), d_inCheckModel(false), - d_proofReconstruction(nullptr), d_dstrat(new TheoryArraysDecisionStrategy(this)), d_dstratInit(false) { @@ -183,22 +179,6 @@ void TheoryArrays::finishInit() { d_equalityEngine->addFunctionKind(kind::ARR_TABLE_FUN); } - - d_proofReconstruction.reset(new ArrayProofReconstruction(d_equalityEngine)); - d_reasonRow = d_equalityEngine->getFreshMergeReasonType(); - d_reasonRow1 = d_equalityEngine->getFreshMergeReasonType(); - d_reasonExt = d_equalityEngine->getFreshMergeReasonType(); - - d_proofReconstruction->setRowMergeTag(d_reasonRow); - d_proofReconstruction->setRow1MergeTag(d_reasonRow1); - d_proofReconstruction->setExtMergeTag(d_reasonExt); - - d_equalityEngine->addPathReconstructionTrigger(d_reasonRow, - d_proofReconstruction.get()); - d_equalityEngine->addPathReconstructionTrigger(d_reasonRow1, - d_proofReconstruction.get()); - d_equalityEngine->addPathReconstructionTrigger(d_reasonExt, - d_proofReconstruction.get()); } ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @@ -440,37 +420,6 @@ bool TheoryArrays::propagateLit(TNode literal) }/* TheoryArrays::propagate(TNode) */ -void TheoryArrays::explain(TNode literal, std::vector<TNode>& assumptions, - eq::EqProof* proof) { - // Do the work - bool polarity = literal.getKind() != kind::NOT; - TNode atom = polarity ? literal : literal[0]; - //eq::EqProof * eqp = new eq::EqProof; - // eq::EqProof * eqp = NULL; - if (atom.getKind() == kind::EQUAL) { - d_equalityEngine->explainEquality( - atom[0], atom[1], polarity, assumptions, proof); - } else { - d_equalityEngine->explainPredicate(atom, polarity, assumptions, proof); - } - if (Debug.isOn("pf::array")) - { - if (proof) - { - Debug("pf::array") << " Proof is : " << std::endl; - proof->debug_print("pf::array"); - } - - Debug("pf::array") << "Array: explain( " << literal << " ):" << std::endl - << "\t"; - for (unsigned i = 0; i < assumptions.size(); ++i) - { - Debug("pf::array") << assumptions[i] << " "; - } - Debug("pf::array") << std::endl; - } -} - TNode TheoryArrays::weakEquivGetRep(TNode node) { TNode pointer; while (true) { @@ -795,7 +744,8 @@ void TheoryArrays::preRegisterTermInternal(TNode node) } // Apply RIntro1 Rule - d_equalityEngine->assertEquality(ni.eqNode(v), true, d_true, d_reasonRow1); + d_equalityEngine->assertEquality( + ni.eqNode(v), true, d_true, theory::eq::MERGED_THROUGH_ROW1); d_infoMap.addStore(node, node); d_infoMap.addInStore(a, node); @@ -864,19 +814,32 @@ void TheoryArrays::preRegisterTerm(TNode node) } } -TrustNode TheoryArrays::explain(TNode literal) +void TheoryArrays::explain(TNode literal, Node& explanation) { - Node explanation = explain(literal, NULL); - return TrustNode::mkTrustPropExp(literal, explanation, nullptr); -} - -Node TheoryArrays::explain(TNode literal, eq::EqProof* proof) { ++d_numExplain; Debug("arrays") << spaces(getSatContext()->getLevel()) << "TheoryArrays::explain(" << literal << ")" << std::endl; std::vector<TNode> assumptions; - explain(literal, assumptions, proof); - return mkAnd(assumptions); + // Do the work + bool polarity = literal.getKind() != kind::NOT; + TNode atom = polarity ? literal : literal[0]; + if (atom.getKind() == kind::EQUAL) + { + d_equalityEngine->explainEquality( + atom[0], atom[1], polarity, assumptions, nullptr); + } + else + { + d_equalityEngine->explainPredicate(atom, polarity, assumptions, nullptr); + } + explanation = mkAnd(assumptions); +} + +TrustNode TheoryArrays::explain(TNode literal) +{ + Node explanation; + explain(literal, explanation); + return TrustNode::mkTrustPropExp(literal, explanation, nullptr); } ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @@ -1329,49 +1292,20 @@ void TheoryArrays::check(Effort e) { TNode k; // k is the skolem for this disequality. - if (!d_proofsEnabled) { - Debug("pf::array") << "Check: kind::NOT: array theory making a skolem" << std::endl; - - // If not in replay mode, generate a fresh skolem variable - k = getSkolem(fact, - "array_ext_index", - indexType, - "an extensional lemma index variable from the theory of arrays", - false); - - // Register this skolem for the proof replay phase - PROOF(ProofManager::getSkolemizationManager()->registerSkolem(fact, k)); - } else { - if (!ProofManager::getSkolemizationManager()->hasSkolem(fact)) { - // In the solution pass we didn't need this skolem. Therefore, we don't need it - // in this reply pass, either. - break; - } - - // Reuse the same skolem as in the solution pass - k = ProofManager::getSkolemizationManager()->getSkolem(fact); - Debug("pf::array") << "Skolem = " << k << std::endl; - } - + Debug("pf::array") + << "Check: kind::NOT: array theory making a skolem" + << std::endl; + k = getSkolem( + fact, + "array_ext_index", + indexType, + "an extensional lemma index variable from the theory of arrays", + false); Node ak = nm->mkNode(kind::SELECT, fact[0][0], k); Node bk = nm->mkNode(kind::SELECT, fact[0][1], k); Node eq = ak.eqNode(bk); Node lemma = fact[0].orNode(eq.notNode()); - // In solve mode we don't care if ak and bk are registered. If they aren't, they'll be registered - // when we output the lemma. However, in replay need the lemma to be propagated, and so we - // preregister manually. - if (d_proofsEnabled) { - if (!d_equalityEngine->hasTerm(ak)) - { - preRegisterTermInternal(ak); - } - if (!d_equalityEngine->hasTerm(bk)) - { - preRegisterTermInternal(bk); - } - } - if (options::arraysPropagate() > 0 && d_equalityEngine->hasTerm(ak) && d_equalityEngine->hasTerm(bk)) { @@ -1381,17 +1315,16 @@ void TheoryArrays::check(Effort e) { << "\teq = " << eq << std::endl << "\treason = " << fact << std::endl; - d_equalityEngine->assertEquality(eq, false, fact, d_reasonExt); + d_equalityEngine->assertEquality( + eq, false, fact, theory::eq::MERGED_THROUGH_EXT); ++d_numProp; } - if (!d_proofsEnabled) { - // If this is the solution pass, generate the lemma. Otherwise, don't generate it - - // as this is the lemma that we're reproving... - Trace("arrays-lem")<<"Arrays::addExtLemma " << lemma <<"\n"; - d_out->lemma(lemma); - ++d_numExt; - } + // If this is the solution pass, generate the lemma. Otherwise, + // don't generate it - as this is the lemma that we're reproving... + Trace("arrays-lem") << "Arrays::addExtLemma " << lemma << "\n"; + d_out->lemma(lemma); + ++d_numExt; } else { Debug("pf::array") << "Check: kind::NOT: array theory NOT making a skolem" << std::endl; d_modelConstraints.push_back(fact); @@ -1480,7 +1413,7 @@ void TheoryArrays::check(Effort e) { lemma = mkAnd(conjunctions, true); // LSH FIXME: which kind of arrays lemma is this Trace("arrays-lem") << "Arrays::addExtLemma " << lemma <<"\n"; - d_out->lemma(lemma, RULE_INVALID, LemmaProperty::SEND_ATOMS); + d_out->lemma(lemma, LemmaProperty::SEND_ATOMS); d_readTableContext->pop(); Trace("arrays") << spaces(getSatContext()->getLevel()) << "Arrays::check(): done" << endl; return; @@ -1908,7 +1841,8 @@ void TheoryArrays::propagate(RowLemmaType lem) if (!bjExists) { preRegisterTermInternal(bj); } - d_equalityEngine->assertEquality(aj_eq_bj, true, reason, d_reasonRow); + d_equalityEngine->assertEquality( + aj_eq_bj, true, reason, theory::eq::MERGED_THROUGH_ROW); ++d_numProp; return; } @@ -1919,7 +1853,8 @@ void TheoryArrays::propagate(RowLemmaType lem) (aj.isConst() && bj.isConst()) ? d_true : aj.eqNode(bj).notNode(); Node i_eq_j = i.eqNode(j); d_permRef.push_back(reason); - d_equalityEngine->assertEquality(i_eq_j, true, reason, d_reasonRow); + d_equalityEngine->assertEquality( + i_eq_j, true, reason, theory::eq::MERGED_THROUGH_ROW); ++d_numProp; return; } @@ -1971,19 +1906,18 @@ void TheoryArrays::queueRowLemma(RowLemmaType lem) && !d_equalityEngine->areDisequal(i, j, false)) { Node i_eq_j; - if (!d_proofsEnabled) { - i_eq_j = d_valuation.ensureLiteral(i.eqNode(j)); // TODO: think about this - } else { - i_eq_j = i.eqNode(j); - } - + i_eq_j = d_valuation.ensureLiteral(i.eqNode(j)); // TODO: think about this +#if 0 + i_eq_j = i.eqNode(j); +#endif getOutputChannel().requirePhase(i_eq_j, true); d_decisionRequests.push(i_eq_j); } // TODO: maybe add triggers here - if ((options::arraysEagerLemmas() || bothExist) && !d_proofsEnabled) { + if (options::arraysEagerLemmas() || bothExist) + { // Make sure that any terms introduced by rewriting are appropriately stored in the equality database Node aj2 = Rewriter::rewrite(aj); if (aj != aj2) { @@ -2162,23 +2096,11 @@ bool TheoryArrays::dischargeLemmas() void TheoryArrays::conflict(TNode a, TNode b) { Debug("pf::array") << "TheoryArrays::Conflict called" << std::endl; - std::shared_ptr<eq::EqProof> proof = d_proofsEnabled ? - std::make_shared<eq::EqProof>() : nullptr; - d_conflictNode = explain(a.eqNode(b), proof.get()); + explain(a.eqNode(b), d_conflictNode); if (!d_inCheckModel) { - std::unique_ptr<ProofArray> proof_array; - - if (d_proofsEnabled) { - proof->debug_print("pf::array"); - proof_array.reset(new ProofArray(proof, - /*row=*/d_reasonRow, - /*row1=*/d_reasonRow1, - /*ext=*/d_reasonExt)); - } - - d_out->conflict(d_conflictNode, std::move(proof_array)); + d_out->conflict(d_conflictNode); } d_conflict = true; |