summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat
-rw-r--r--src/theory/arith/theory_arith.cpp297
-rw-r--r--src/theory/arith/theory_arith.h142
2 files changed, 233 insertions, 206 deletions
diff --git a/src/theory/arith/theory_arith.cpp b/src/theory/arith/theory_arith.cpp
index 2f62c8bc1..514dce3f7 100644
--- a/src/theory/arith/theory_arith.cpp
+++ b/src/theory/arith/theory_arith.cpp
@@ -47,13 +47,10 @@ using namespace CVC4::kind;
using namespace CVC4::theory;
using namespace CVC4::theory::arith;
-struct EagerSplittingTag {};
-typedef expr::Attribute<EagerSplittingTag, bool> EagerlySplitUpon;
TheoryArith::TheoryArith(context::Context* c, OutputChannel& out) :
Theory(c, out),
- d_preprocessed(c),
d_constants(NodeManager::currentNM()),
d_partialModel(c),
d_diseq(c),
@@ -105,25 +102,20 @@ bool isNormalAtom(TNode n){
}
void TheoryArith::preRegisterTerm(TNode n) {
- Debug("arith_preregister") << "arith: begin TheoryArith::preRegisterTerm("
- << n << ")" << endl;
-
+ Debug("arith_preregister") <<"begin arith::preRegisterTerm("<< n <<")"<< endl;
Kind k = n.getKind();
- if(n.getKind() == EQUAL){
- if(!n.getAttribute(EagerlySplitUpon())){
- TNode left = n[0];
- TNode right = n[1];
+ if(k == EQUAL){
+ TNode left = n[0];
+ TNode right = n[1];
- Node lt = NodeManager::currentNM()->mkNode(LT, left,right);
- Node gt = NodeManager::currentNM()->mkNode(GT, left,right);
- Node eagerSplit = NodeManager::currentNM()->mkNode(OR, n, lt, gt);
+ Node lt = NodeManager::currentNM()->mkNode(LT, left,right);
+ Node gt = NodeManager::currentNM()->mkNode(GT, left,right);
+ Node eagerSplit = NodeManager::currentNM()->mkNode(OR, n, lt, gt);
- d_splits.push_back(eagerSplit);
+ d_splits.push_back(eagerSplit);
- n.setAttribute(EagerlySplitUpon(), true);
- d_out->augmentingLemma(eagerSplit);
- }
+ d_out->augmentingLemma(eagerSplit);
}
if(n.getMetaKind() == metakind::VARIABLE){
@@ -148,13 +140,10 @@ void TheoryArith::preRegisterTerm(TNode n) {
}
}
}
-
- Debug("arith_preregister") << "arith: end TheoryArith::preRegisterTerm("
- << n << ")" << endl;
+ Debug("arith_preregister") << "end arith::preRegisterTerm("<< n <<")"<< endl;
}
void TheoryArith::setupSlack(TNode left){
- //TODO
TypeNode real_type = NodeManager::currentNM()->realType();
Node slack = NodeManager::currentNM()->mkVar(real_type);
@@ -179,7 +168,6 @@ void TheoryArith::checkBasicVariable(TNode basic){
}
/* Requirements:
- * Variable must have been set to be basic.
* For basic variables the row must have been added to the tableau.
*/
void TheoryArith::setupVariable(TNode x){
@@ -194,20 +182,16 @@ void TheoryArith::setupVariable(TNode x){
//This can go away if the tableau creation is done at preregister
//time instead of register
-
- DeltaRational q = computeRowValueUsingSavedAssignment(x);
- if(!(q == d_constants.d_ZERO_DELTA)){
- Debug("arith_setup") << "setup("<<x<< " " <<q<<")"<<std::endl;
- }
- d_partialModel.initialize(x,q);
-
- q = computeRowValueUsingAssignment(x);
- if(!(q == d_constants.d_ZERO_DELTA)){
- Debug("arith_setup") << "setup("<<x<< " " <<q<<")"<<std::endl;
- }
- d_partialModel.setAssignment(x,q);
+ DeltaRational safeAssignment = computeRowValueUsingSavedAssignment(x);
+ DeltaRational assignment = computeRowValueUsingAssignment(x);
+ d_partialModel.initialize(x,safeAssignment);
+ d_partialModel.setAssignment(x,assignment);
checkBasicVariable(x);
+ //Strictly speaking checking x is unnessecary as it cannot have an upper or
+ //lower bound. This is done to strongly enforce the notion that basic
+ //variables should not be changed without begin checked.
+
}
Debug("arithgc") << "setupVariable("<<x<<")"<<std::endl;
};
@@ -220,10 +204,10 @@ DeltaRational TheoryArith::computeRowValueUsingAssignment(TNode x){
DeltaRational sum = d_constants.d_ZERO_DELTA;
Row* row = d_tableau.lookup(x);
- for(std::set<TNode>::iterator i = row->begin(); i != row->end();++i){
+ for(Row::iterator i = row->begin(); i != row->end();++i){
TNode nonbasic = *i;
const Rational& coeff = row->lookup(nonbasic);
- DeltaRational assignment = d_partialModel.getAssignment(nonbasic);
+ const DeltaRational& assignment = d_partialModel.getAssignment(nonbasic);
sum = sum + (assignment * coeff);
}
return sum;
@@ -237,10 +221,10 @@ DeltaRational TheoryArith::computeRowValueUsingSavedAssignment(TNode x){
DeltaRational sum = d_constants.d_ZERO_DELTA;
Row* row = d_tableau.lookup(x);
- for(std::set<TNode>::iterator i = row->begin(); i != row->end();++i){
+ for(Row::iterator i = row->begin(); i != row->end();++i){
TNode nonbasic = *i;
const Rational& coeff = row->lookup(nonbasic);
- DeltaRational assignment = d_partialModel.getSafeAssignment(nonbasic);
+ const DeltaRational& assignment = d_partialModel.getSafeAssignment(nonbasic);
sum = sum + (assignment * coeff);
}
return sum;
@@ -250,19 +234,13 @@ Node TheoryArith::rewrite(TNode n){
Debug("arith") << "rewrite(" << n << ")" << endl;
Node result = d_rewriter.rewrite(n);
- Debug("arith-rewrite") << "rewrite("
- << n << " -> " << result
- << ")" << endl;
+ Debug("arith-rewrite") << "rewrite(" << n << ") -> " << result << endl;
return result;
}
void TheoryArith::registerTerm(TNode tn){
Debug("arith") << "registerTerm(" << tn << ")" << endl;
-
- if(tn.getKind() == kind::BUILTIN) return;
-
-
}
/* procedure AssertUpper( x_i <= c_i) */
@@ -329,7 +307,6 @@ bool TheoryArith::AssertLower(TNode n, TNode original){
}else{
checkBasicVariable(x_i);
}
- //d_partialModel.printModel(x_i);
return false;
}
@@ -351,7 +328,7 @@ void TheoryArith::update(TNode x_i, DeltaRational& v){
if(row_j->has(x_i)){
const Rational& a_ji = row_j->lookup(x_i);
- DeltaRational assignment = d_partialModel.getAssignment(x_j);
+ const DeltaRational& assignment = d_partialModel.getAssignment(x_j);
DeltaRational nAssignment = assignment+(diff * a_ji);
d_partialModel.setAssignment(x_j, nAssignment);
checkBasicVariable(x_j);
@@ -372,7 +349,7 @@ void TheoryArith::pivotAndUpdate(TNode x_i, TNode x_j, DeltaRational& v){
const Rational& a_ij = row_i->lookup(x_j);
- DeltaRational betaX_i = d_partialModel.getAssignment(x_i);
+ const DeltaRational& betaX_i = d_partialModel.getAssignment(x_i);
Rational inv_aij = a_ij.inverse();
DeltaRational theta = (v - betaX_i)*inv_aij;
@@ -390,7 +367,7 @@ void TheoryArith::pivotAndUpdate(TNode x_i, TNode x_j, DeltaRational& v){
Row* row_k = d_tableau.lookup(x_k);
if(x_k != x_i && row_k->has(x_j)){
- Rational a_kj = row_k->lookup(x_j);
+ const Rational& a_kj = row_k->lookup(x_j);
DeltaRational nextAssignment = d_partialModel.getAssignment(x_k) + (theta * a_kj);
d_partialModel.setAssignment(x_k, nextAssignment);
checkBasicVariable(x_k);
@@ -438,40 +415,28 @@ TNode TheoryArith::selectSmallestInconsistentVar(){
return TNode::null();
}
-TNode TheoryArith::selectSlackBelow(TNode x_i){ //beta(x_i) < l_i
- Row* row_i = d_tableau.lookup(x_i);
+template <bool above>
+TNode TheoryArith::selectSlack(TNode x_i){
+ Row* row_i = d_tableau.lookup(x_i);
- typedef std::set<TNode>::iterator NonBasicIter;
-
- for(NonBasicIter nbi = row_i->begin(); nbi != row_i->end(); ++nbi){
+ for(Row::iterator nbi = row_i->begin(); nbi != row_i->end(); ++nbi){
TNode nonbasic = *nbi;
-
- Rational a_ij = row_i->lookup(nonbasic);
- if(a_ij > d_constants.d_ZERO && d_partialModel.strictlyBelowUpperBound(nonbasic)){
- return nonbasic;
- }else if(a_ij < d_constants.d_ZERO && d_partialModel.strictlyAboveLowerBound(nonbasic)){
- return nonbasic;
- }
- }
- return TNode::null();
-}
-
-TNode TheoryArith::selectSlackAbove(TNode x_i){ // beta(x_i) > u_i
- Row* row_i = d_tableau.lookup(x_i);
-
- typedef std::set<TNode>::iterator NonBasicIter;
-
- for(NonBasicIter nbi = row_i->begin(); nbi != row_i->end(); ++nbi){
- TNode nonbasic = *nbi;
-
- Rational a_ij = row_i->lookup(nonbasic);
- if(a_ij < d_constants.d_ZERO && d_partialModel.strictlyBelowUpperBound(nonbasic)){
- return nonbasic;
- }else if(a_ij > d_constants.d_ZERO && d_partialModel.strictlyAboveLowerBound(nonbasic)){
- return nonbasic;
+ const Rational& a_ij = row_i->lookup(nonbasic);
+ int cmp = a_ij.cmp(d_constants.d_ZERO);
+ if(above){ // beta(x_i) > u_i
+ if( cmp < 0 && d_partialModel.strictlyBelowUpperBound(nonbasic)){
+ return nonbasic;
+ }else if( cmp > 0 && d_partialModel.strictlyAboveLowerBound(nonbasic)){
+ return nonbasic;
+ }
+ }else{ //beta(x_i) < l_i
+ if(cmp > 0 && d_partialModel.strictlyBelowUpperBound(nonbasic)){
+ return nonbasic;
+ }else if(cmp < 0 && d_partialModel.strictlyAboveLowerBound(nonbasic)){
+ return nonbasic;
+ }
}
}
-
return TNode::null();
}
@@ -522,9 +487,7 @@ Node TheoryArith::generateConflictAbove(TNode conflictVar){
nb << bound;
- typedef std::set<TNode>::iterator NonBasicIter;
-
- for(NonBasicIter nbi = row_i->begin(); nbi != row_i->end(); ++nbi){
+ for(Row::iterator nbi = row_i->begin(); nbi != row_i->end(); ++nbi){
TNode nonbasic = *nbi;
const Rational& a_ij = row_i->lookup(nonbasic);
@@ -560,9 +523,7 @@ Node TheoryArith::generateConflictBelow(TNode conflictVar){
<< " " << bound << endl;
nb << bound;
- typedef std::set<TNode>::iterator NonBasicIter;
-
- for(NonBasicIter nbi = row_i->begin(); nbi != row_i->end(); ++nbi){
+ for(Row::iterator nbi = row_i->begin(); nbi != row_i->end(); ++nbi){
TNode nonbasic = *nbi;
const Rational& a_ij = row_i->lookup(nonbasic);
@@ -593,11 +554,9 @@ Node TheoryArith::generateConflictBelow(TNode conflictVar){
Node TheoryArith::simulatePreprocessing(TNode n){
if(n.getKind() == NOT){
Node sub = simulatePreprocessing(n[0]);
- if(sub.getKind() == NOT){
- return sub[0];
- }else{
- return NodeManager::currentNM()->mkNode(NOT,sub);
- }
+ Assert(sub.getKind() != NOT);
+ return NodeManager::currentNM()->mkNode(NOT,sub);
+
}else{
Assert(isNormalAtom(n));
Kind k = n.getKind();
@@ -615,132 +574,83 @@ Node TheoryArith::simulatePreprocessing(TNode n){
}
}
+bool TheoryArith::assertionCases(TNode original, TNode assertion){
+ switch(assertion.getKind()){
+ case LEQ:
+ return AssertUpper(assertion, original);
+ case GEQ:
+ return AssertLower(assertion, original);
+ case EQUAL:
+ if(AssertUpper(assertion, original)){
+ return true;
+ }else{
+ return AssertLower(assertion, original);
+ }
+ case NOT:
+ {
+ TNode atom = assertion[0];
+ switch(atom.getKind()){
+ case LEQ: //(not (LEQ x c)) <=> (GT x c)
+ {
+ Node pushedin = pushInNegation(assertion);
+ return AssertLower(pushedin,original);
+ }
+ case GEQ: //(not (GEQ x c) <=> (LT x c)
+ {
+ Node pushedin = pushInNegation(assertion);
+ return AssertUpper(pushedin,original);
+ }
+ case EQUAL:
+ d_diseq.push_back(assertion);
+ return false;
+ default:
+ Unreachable();
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+ default:
+ Unreachable();
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
void TheoryArith::check(Effort level){
Debug("arith") << "TheoryArith::check begun" << std::endl;
-
- bool conflictDuringAnAssert = false;
-
- while(!done() && !conflictDuringAnAssert){
- //checkTableau();
+ while(!done()){
Node original = get();
Node assertion = simulatePreprocessing(original);
Debug("arith_assertions") << "arith assertion(" << original
<< " \\-> " << assertion << ")" << std::endl;
- d_preprocessed.push_back(assertion);
-
- switch(assertion.getKind()){
- case LEQ:
- conflictDuringAnAssert = AssertUpper(assertion, original);
- break;
- case GEQ:
- conflictDuringAnAssert = AssertLower(assertion, original);
- break;
- case EQUAL:
- conflictDuringAnAssert = AssertUpper(assertion, original);
- if(!conflictDuringAnAssert){
- conflictDuringAnAssert = AssertLower(assertion, original);
- }
- break;
- case NOT:
- {
- TNode atom = assertion[0];
- switch(atom.getKind()){
- case LEQ: //(not (LEQ x c)) <=> (GT x c)
- {
- Node pushedin = pushInNegation(assertion);
- conflictDuringAnAssert = AssertLower(pushedin,original);
- break;
- }
- case GEQ: //(not (GEQ x c) <=> (LT x c)
- {
- Node pushedin = pushInNegation(assertion);
- conflictDuringAnAssert = AssertUpper(pushedin,original);
- break;
- }
- case EQUAL:
- d_diseq.push_back(assertion);
- break;
- default:
- Unhandled();
- }
- break;
- }
- default:
- Unhandled();
- }
- }
- if(conflictDuringAnAssert){
- while(!done()) { get(); }
-
- if(debugTagIsOn("paranoid:check_tableau")){ checkTableau(); }
- d_partialModel.revertAssignmentChanges();
- if(debugTagIsOn("paranoid:check_tableau")){ checkTableau(); }
-
+ bool conflictDuringAnAssert = assertionCases(original, assertion);
+ if(conflictDuringAnAssert){
+ if(debugTagIsOn("paranoid:check_tableau")){ checkTableau(); }
+ d_partialModel.revertAssignmentChanges();
+ if(debugTagIsOn("paranoid:check_tableau")){ checkTableau(); }
- //return
- return;
+ return;
+ }
}
if(fullEffort(level)){
+ if(debugTagIsOn("paranoid:check_tableau")){ checkTableau(); }
+
Node possibleConflict = updateInconsistentVars();
if(possibleConflict != Node::null()){
- if(debugTagIsOn("paranoid:check_tableau")){ checkTableau(); }
d_partialModel.revertAssignmentChanges();
- if(debugTagIsOn("paranoid:check_tableau")){ checkTableau(); }
-
d_out->conflict(possibleConflict, true);
-
- Debug("arith_conflict") << "Found a conflict "
- << possibleConflict << endl;
+ Debug("arith_conflict") <<"Found a conflict "<< possibleConflict << endl;
}else{
- if(debugTagIsOn("paranoid:check_tableau")){ checkTableau(); }
-
d_partialModel.commitAssignmentChanges();
-
- if(debugTagIsOn("paranoid:check_tableau")){ checkTableau(); }
-
- Debug("arith_conflict") << "No conflict found" << endl;
}
+ if(debugTagIsOn("paranoid:check_tableau")){ checkTableau(); }
}
- // if(fullEffort(level)){
-// bool enqueuedCaseSplit = false;
-// typedef context::CDList<Node>::const_iterator diseq_iterator;
-// for(diseq_iterator i = d_diseq.begin(); i!= d_diseq.end(); ++i){
-
-// Node assertion = *i;
-// Debug("arith") << "splitting" << assertion << endl;
-// TNode eq = assertion[0];
-// TNode x_i = eq[0];
-// TNode c_i = eq[1];
-// DeltaRational constant = c_i.getConst<Rational>();
-// Debug("arith") << "broken apart" << endl;
-// if(d_partialModel.getAssignment(x_i) == constant){
-// Debug("arith") << "here" << endl;
-// enqueuedCaseSplit = true;
-// Node lt = NodeManager::currentNM()->mkNode(LT,x_i,c_i);
-// Node gt = NodeManager::currentNM()->mkNode(GT,x_i,c_i);
-// Node caseSplit = NodeManager::currentNM()->mkNode(OR, eq, lt, gt);
-// //d_out->enqueueCaseSplits(caseSplit);
-// Debug("arith") << "finished" << caseSplit << endl;
-// }
-// Debug("arith") << "end of for loop" << endl;
-
-// }
-// Debug("arith") << "finished" << endl;
-
-// if(enqueuedCaseSplit){
-// //d_out->caseSplit();
-// //Warning() << "Outstanding case split in theory arith" << endl;
-// }
-// }
-
Debug("arith") << "TheoryArith::check end" << std::endl;
}
@@ -760,7 +670,7 @@ void TheoryArith::checkTableau(){
Row* row_k = d_tableau.lookup(basic);
DeltaRational sum;
Debug("paranoid:check_tableau") << "starting row" << basic << endl;
- for(std::set<TNode>::iterator nonbasicIter = row_k->begin();
+ for(Row::iterator nonbasicIter = row_k->begin();
nonbasicIter != row_k->end();
++nonbasicIter){
TNode nonbasic = *nonbasicIter;
@@ -770,7 +680,8 @@ void TheoryArith::checkTableau(){
sum = sum + (beta*coeff);
}
DeltaRational shouldBe = d_partialModel.getAssignment(basic);
- Debug("paranoid:check_tableau") << "ending row" << sum << "," << shouldBe << endl;
+ Debug("paranoid:check_tableau") << "ending row" << sum
+ << "," << shouldBe << endl;
Assert(sum == shouldBe);
}
diff --git a/src/theory/arith/theory_arith.h b/src/theory/arith/theory_arith.h
index e54f273e9..ddd876f76 100644
--- a/src/theory/arith/theory_arith.h
+++ b/src/theory/arith/theory_arith.h
@@ -38,73 +38,189 @@ namespace CVC4 {
namespace theory {
namespace arith {
+
+/**
+ * Implementation of QF_LRA.
+ * Based upon:
+ * http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/leonardo/cav06.pdf
+ */
class TheoryArith : public Theory {
private:
+
+ /* TODO Everything in the chopping block needs to be killed. */
/* Chopping block begins */
std::vector<Node> d_splits;
//This stores the eager splits sent out of the theory.
- //TODO get rid of this.
-
- context::CDList<Node> d_preprocessed;
- //TODO This is currently needed to save preprocessed nodes that may not
- //currently have an outisde reference. Get rid of when preprocessing is occuring
- //correctly.
std::vector<Node> d_variables;
- //TODO get rid of this. Currently forces every variable and skolem constant that
+ // Currently forces every variable and skolem constant that
// can hit the tableau to stay alive forever!
- //This needs to come before d_partialModel and d_tableau in the file
+
+ /* Chopping block ends */
+ /**
+ * Priority Queue of the basic variables that may be inconsistent.
+ *
+ * This is required to contain at least 1 instance of every inconsistent
+ * basic variable. This is only required to be a superset though so its
+ * contents must be checked to still be basic and inconsistent.
+ */
std::priority_queue<Node> d_possiblyInconsistent;
- /* Chopping block ends */
+ /** Stores system wide constants to avoid unnessecary reconstruction. */
ArithConstants d_constants;
+
+ /**
+ * Manages information about the assignment and upper and lower bounds on
+ * variables.
+ */
ArithPartialModel d_partialModel;
+
+ /**
+ * List of all of the inequalities asserted in the current context.
+ */
context::CDList<Node> d_diseq;
- Tableau d_tableau;
- ArithRewriter d_rewriter;
+ /**
+ * The tableau for all of the constraints seen thus far in the system.
+ */
+ Tableau d_tableau;
+ /**
+ * The rewriter module for arithmetic.
+ */
+ ArithRewriter d_rewriter;
public:
TheoryArith(context::Context* c, OutputChannel& out);
~TheoryArith();
+ /**
+ * Rewrites a node to a unique normal form given in normal_form_notes.txt
+ */
Node rewrite(TNode n);
+ /**
+ * Does non-context dependent setup for a node connected to a theory.
+ */
void preRegisterTerm(TNode n);
+
+ /** CD setup for a node. Currently does nothing. */
void registerTerm(TNode n);
+
void check(Effort e);
void propagate(Effort e) { Unimplemented(); }
void explain(TNode n, Effort e) { Unimplemented(); }
private:
+ /**
+ * Assert*(n, orig) takes an bound n that is implied by orig.
+ * and asserts that as a new bound if it is tighter than the current bound
+ * and updates the value of a basic variable if needed.
+ * If this new bound is in conflict with the other bound,
+ * a conflict is created and asserted to the output channel.
+ *
+ * orig must be an atom in the SAT solver so that it can be used for
+ * conflict analysis.
+ *
+ * n is of the form (x =?= c) where x is a variable,
+ * c is a constant and =?= is either LT, LEQ, EQ, GEQ, or GT.
+ *
+ * returns true if a conflict was asserted.
+ */
bool AssertLower(TNode n, TNode orig);
bool AssertUpper(TNode n, TNode orig);
+
+ /**
+ * Updates the assignment of a nonbasic variable x_i to v.
+ * Also updates the assignment of basic variables accordingly.
+ */
void update(TNode x_i, DeltaRational& v);
+
+ /**
+ * Updates the value of a basic variable x_i to v,
+ * and then pivots x_i with the nonbasic variable in its row x_j.
+ * Updates the assignment of the other basic variables accordingly.
+ */
void pivotAndUpdate(TNode x_i, TNode x_j, DeltaRational& v);
+ /**
+ * Tries to update the assignments of variables such that all of the
+ * assignments are consistent with their bounds.
+ *
+ * This is done by searching through the tableau.
+ * If all of the variables can be made consistent with their bounds
+ * Node::null() is returned. Otherwise a minimized conflict is returned.
+ *
+ * If a conflict is found, changes to the assignments need to be reverted.
+ *
+ * Tableau pivoting is performed so variables may switch from being basic to
+ * nonbasic and vice versa.
+ *
+ * Corresponds to the "check()" procedure in [Cav06].
+ */
Node updateInconsistentVars();
- TNode selectSlackBelow(TNode x_i);
- TNode selectSlackAbove(TNode x_i);
+ /**
+ * Given the basic variable x_i,
+ * this function finds the smallest nonbasic variable x_j in the row of x_i
+ * in the tableau that can "take up the slack" to let x_i satisfy its bounds.
+ * This returns TNode::null() if none exists.
+ *
+ * More formally one of the following conditions must be satisfied:
+ * - above && a_ij < 0 && assignment(x_j) < upperbound(x_j)
+ * - above && a_ij > 0 && assignment(x_j) > lowerbound(x_j)
+ * - !above && a_ij > 0 && assignment(x_j) < upperbound(x_j)
+ * - !above && a_ij < 0 && assignment(x_j) > lowerbound(x_j)
+ */
+ template <bool above>
+ TNode selectSlack(TNode x_i);
+
+ TNode selectSlackBelow(TNode x_i) { return selectSlack<false>(x_i); }
+ TNode selectSlackAbove(TNode x_i) { return selectSlack<true>(x_i); }
+
+ /**
+ * Returns the smallest basic variable whose assignment is not consistent
+ * with its upper and lower bounds.
+ */
TNode selectSmallestInconsistentVar();
+ /**
+ * Given a non-basic variable that is know to not be updatable
+ * to a consistent value, construct and return a conflict.
+ * Follows section 4.2 in the CAV06 paper.
+ */
Node generateConflictAbove(TNode conflictVar);
Node generateConflictBelow(TNode conflictVar);
+
+ /** Initial (not context dependent) sets up for a variable.*/
void setupVariable(TNode x);
+
+ /** Initial (not context dependent) sets up for a new slack variable.*/
void setupSlack(TNode left);
+
+ /** Computes the value of a row in the tableau using the current assignment.*/
DeltaRational computeRowValueUsingAssignment(TNode x);
+
+ /** Computes the value of a row in the tableau using the safe assignment.*/
DeltaRational computeRowValueUsingSavedAssignment(TNode x);
+
+ /** Checks to make sure the assignment is consistent with the tableau. */
void checkTableau();
+ /** Check to make sure all of the basic variables are within their bounds. */
void checkBasicVariable(TNode basic);
+ /**
+ * Handles the case splitting for check() for a new assertion.
+ * returns true if their is a conflict.
+ */
+ bool assertionCases(TNode original, TNode assertion);
//TODO get rid of this!
generated by cgit on debian on lair
contact matthew@masot.net with questions or feedback