diff options
author | ajreynol <andrew.j.reynolds@gmail.com> | 2016-04-12 10:13:45 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | ajreynol <andrew.j.reynolds@gmail.com> | 2016-04-12 10:13:45 -0500 |
commit | 4ff2946e1338d3f500b7e6bababee50fadad68d6 (patch) | |
tree | 6f1306e4476e3f7496d7a4e045e63d942802a392 /src/theory/quantifiers/quant_conflict_find.cpp | |
parent | 1b2e6c81be2a8ab0656ff2ee3938ef4587e24e25 (diff) |
Optimizations for QCF to check relevant domain of variable argument positions eagerly, global ordering mechanism for quantified formulas within check. Refactoring of term database.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/theory/quantifiers/quant_conflict_find.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/theory/quantifiers/quant_conflict_find.cpp | 201 |
1 files changed, 94 insertions, 107 deletions
diff --git a/src/theory/quantifiers/quant_conflict_find.cpp b/src/theory/quantifiers/quant_conflict_find.cpp index e5df41510..1cbfbd99b 100644 --- a/src/theory/quantifiers/quant_conflict_find.cpp +++ b/src/theory/quantifiers/quant_conflict_find.cpp @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include "theory/quantifiers/quant_util.h" #include "theory/quantifiers/term_database.h" #include "theory/quantifiers/trigger.h" +#include "theory/quantifiers/first_order_model.h" #include "theory/theory_engine.h" using namespace CVC4::kind; @@ -46,7 +47,7 @@ QuantInfo::~QuantInfo() { } -void QuantInfo::initialize( Node q, Node qn ) { +void QuantInfo::initialize( QuantConflictFind * p, Node q, Node qn ) { d_q = q; for( unsigned i=0; i<q[0].getNumChildren(); i++ ){ d_match.push_back( TNode::null() ); @@ -107,6 +108,59 @@ void QuantInfo::initialize( Node q, Node qn ) { Trace("qcf-invalid") << "QCF invalid : body of formula cannot be processed." << std::endl; } Trace("qcf-qregister-summary") << "QCF register : " << ( d_mg->isValid() ? "VALID " : "INVALID" ) << " : " << q << std::endl; + + if( d_mg->isValid() ){ + //optimization : record variable argument positions for terms that must be matched + std::vector< TNode > vars; + //TODO: revisit this, makes QCF faster, but misses conflicts due to caring about paths that may not be relevant (starExec jobs 14136/14137) + //if( options::qcfSkipRd() ){ + // for( unsigned j=q[0].getNumChildren(); j<d_vars.size(); j++ ){ + // vars.push_back( d_vars[j] ); + // } + //} + //get all variables that are always relevant + std::map< TNode, bool > visited; + getPropagateVars( vars, q[1], false, visited ); + for( unsigned j=0; j<vars.size(); j++ ){ + Node v = vars[j]; + TNode f = p->getTermDatabase()->getMatchOperator( v ); + if( !f.isNull() ){ + Trace("qcf-opt") << "Record variable argument positions in " << v << ", op=" << f << "..." << std::endl; + for( unsigned k=0; k<v.getNumChildren(); k++ ){ + Node n = v[k]; + std::map< TNode, int >::iterator itv = d_var_num.find( n ); + if( itv!=d_var_num.end() ){ + Trace("qcf-opt") << " arg " << k << " is var #" << itv->second << std::endl; + if( std::find( d_var_rel_dom[itv->second][f].begin(), d_var_rel_dom[itv->second][f].end(), k )==d_var_rel_dom[itv->second][f].end() ){ + d_var_rel_dom[itv->second][f].push_back( k ); + } + } + } + } + } + } +} + +void QuantInfo::getPropagateVars( std::vector< TNode >& vars, TNode n, bool pol, std::map< TNode, bool >& visited ){ + std::map< TNode, bool >::iterator itv = visited.find( n ); + if( itv==visited.end() ){ + visited[n] = true; + bool rec = true; + bool newPol = pol; + if( d_var_num.find( n )!=d_var_num.end() ){ + Assert( std::find( vars.begin(), vars.end(), n )==vars.end() ); + vars.push_back( n ); + }else if( MatchGen::isHandledBoolConnective( n ) ){ + Assert( n.getKind()!=IMPLIES ); + QuantPhaseReq::getEntailPolarity( n, 0, true, pol, rec, newPol ); + } + Trace("qcf-opt-debug") << "getPropagateVars " << n << ", pol = " << pol << ", rec = " << rec << std::endl; + if( rec ){ + for( unsigned i=0; i<n.getNumChildren(); i++ ){ + getPropagateVars( vars, n[i], pol, visited ); + } + } + } } void QuantInfo::registerNode( Node n, bool hasPol, bool pol, bool beneathQuant ) { @@ -327,7 +381,7 @@ int QuantInfo::addConstraint( QuantConflictFind * p, int v, TNode n, int vn, boo return 1; }else{ //std::map< int, TNode >::iterator itm = d_match.find( v ); - + bool isGroundRep = false; if( vn!=-1 ){ Debug("qcf-match-debug") << " ...Variable bound to variable" << std::endl; //std::map< int, TNode >::iterator itmn = d_match.find( vn ); @@ -373,13 +427,14 @@ int QuantInfo::addConstraint( QuantConflictFind * p, int v, TNode n, int vn, boo }else{ Debug("qcf-match-debug") << " ...Variable bound to ground" << std::endl; if( d_match[v].isNull() ){ + //isGroundRep = true; ?? }else{ //compare ground values Debug("qcf-match-debug") << " -> Ground value, compare " << d_match[v] << " "<< n << std::endl; return p->areMatchEqual( d_match[v], n ) ? 0 : -1; } } - if( setMatch( p, v, n ) ){ + if( setMatch( p, v, n, isGroundRep ) ){ Debug("qcf-match-debug") << " -> success" << std::endl; return 1; }else{ @@ -445,8 +500,23 @@ bool QuantInfo::isConstrainedVar( int v ) { } } -bool QuantInfo::setMatch( QuantConflictFind * p, int v, TNode n ) { +bool QuantInfo::setMatch( QuantConflictFind * p, int v, TNode n, bool isGroundRep ) { if( getCurrentCanBeEqual( p, v, n ) ){ + if( isGroundRep ){ + //fail if n does not exist in the relevant domain of each of the argument positions + std::map< int, std::map< TNode, std::vector< unsigned > > >::iterator it = d_var_rel_dom.find( v ); + if( it!=d_var_rel_dom.end() ){ + for( std::map< TNode, std::vector< unsigned > >::iterator it2 = it->second.begin(); it2 != it->second.end(); ++it2 ){ + for( unsigned j=0; j<it2->second.size(); j++ ){ + Debug("qcf-match-debug2") << n << " in relevant domain " << it2->second << "." << it2->second[j] << "?" << std::endl; + if( !p->getTermDatabase()->inRelevantDomain( it2->first, it2->second[j], n ) ){ + Debug("qcf-match-debug") << " -> fail, since " << n << " is not in relevant domain of " << it2->second << "." << it2->second[j] << std::endl; + return false; + } + } + } + } + } Debug("qcf-match-debug") << "-- bind : " << v << " -> " << n << ", checked " << d_curr_var_deq[v].size() << " disequalities" << std::endl; d_match[v] = n; return true; @@ -566,7 +636,7 @@ bool QuantInfo::completeMatch( QuantConflictFind * p, std::vector< int >& assign if( !z.isNull() ){ Trace("qcf-tconstraint-debug") << "...set " << d_vars[vn] << " = " << z << std::endl; assigned.push_back( vn ); - if( !setMatch( p, vn, z ) ){ + if( !setMatch( p, vn, z, false ) ){ success = false; break; } @@ -608,7 +678,7 @@ bool QuantInfo::completeMatch( QuantConflictFind * p, std::vector< int >& assign if( !sum.isNull() ){ assigned.push_back( slv_v ); Trace("qcf-tconstraint-debug") << "...set " << d_vars[slv_v] << " = " << sum << std::endl; - if( !setMatch( p, slv_v, sum ) ){ + if( !setMatch( p, slv_v, sum, false ) ){ success = false; } p->d_tempCache.push_back( sum ); @@ -694,7 +764,7 @@ bool QuantInfo::completeMatch( QuantConflictFind * p, std::vector< int >& assign int currIndex = d_una_eqc_count[d_una_index]; d_una_eqc_count[d_una_index]++; Trace("qcf-check-unassign") << d_unassigned[d_una_index] << "->" << p->d_eqcs[d_unassigned_tn[d_una_index]][currIndex] << std::endl; - if( setMatch( p, d_unassigned[d_una_index], p->d_eqcs[d_unassigned_tn[d_una_index]][currIndex] ) ){ + if( setMatch( p, d_unassigned[d_una_index], p->d_eqcs[d_unassigned_tn[d_una_index]][currIndex], true ) ){ d_match_term[d_unassigned[d_una_index]] = TNode::null(); Trace("qcf-check-unassign") << "Succeeded match " << d_una_index << std::endl; d_una_index++; @@ -1125,7 +1195,7 @@ void MatchGen::reset( QuantConflictFind * p, bool tgt, QuantInfo * qi ) { }else{ //unassigned, set match to true/false d_qni_bound[0] = vn; - qi->setMatch( p, vn, d_tgt ? p->d_true : p->d_false ); + qi->setMatch( p, vn, d_tgt ? p->d_true : p->d_false, false ); d_child_counter = 0; } if( d_child_counter==0 ){ @@ -1365,17 +1435,6 @@ bool MatchGen::getNextMatch( QuantConflictFind * p, QuantInfo * qi ) { d_qni_bound_cons.clear(); } } - /* - if( d_type==typ_var && p->d_effort==QuantConflictFind::effort_mc && !d_matched_basis ){ - d_matched_basis = true; - Node f = getMatchOperator( d_n ); - TNode mbo = p->getTermDatabase()->getModelBasisOpTerm( f ); - if( qi->setMatch( p, d_qni_var_num[0], mbo ) ){ - success = true; - d_qni_bound[0] = d_qni_var_num[0]; - } - } - */ } Debug("qcf-match") << " ...finished matching for " << d_n << ", success = " << success << std::endl; d_wasSet = success; @@ -1595,7 +1654,7 @@ bool MatchGen::doMatching( QuantConflictFind * p, QuantInfo * qi ) { if( it != d_qn[index]->d_data.end() ) { d_qni.push_back( it ); //set the match - if( it->first.getType().isComparableTo( qi->d_var_types[repVar] ) && qi->setMatch( p, d_qni_bound[index], it->first ) ){ + if( it->first.getType().isComparableTo( qi->d_var_types[repVar] ) && qi->setMatch( p, d_qni_bound[index], it->first, true ) ){ Debug("qcf-match-debug") << " Binding variable" << std::endl; if( d_qn.size()<d_qni_size ){ d_qn.push_back( &it->second ); @@ -1640,7 +1699,7 @@ bool MatchGen::doMatching( QuantConflictFind * p, QuantInfo * qi ) { d_qni[index]++; if( d_qni[index]!=d_qn[index]->d_data.end() ){ success = true; - if( qi->setMatch( p, itb->second, d_qni[index]->first ) ){ + if( qi->setMatch( p, itb->second, d_qni[index]->first, true ) ){ Debug("qcf-match-debug") << " Bind next variable" << std::endl; if( d_qn.size()<d_qni_size ){ d_qn.push_back( &d_qni[index]->second ); @@ -1756,8 +1815,7 @@ bool MatchGen::isHandled( TNode n ) { QuantConflictFind::QuantConflictFind( QuantifiersEngine * qe, context::Context* c ) : QuantifiersModule( qe ), -d_conflict( c, false ), -d_qassert( c ) { +d_conflict( c, false ) { d_fid_count = 0; d_true = NodeManager::currentNM()->mkConst<bool>(true); d_false = NodeManager::currentNM()->mkConst<bool>(false); @@ -1782,7 +1840,7 @@ void QuantConflictFind::registerQuantifier( Node q ) { Trace("qcf-qregister") << " : " << q << std::endl; //make QcfNode structure Trace("qcf-qregister") << "- Get relevant equality/disequality pairs, calculate flattening..." << std::endl; - d_qinfo[q].initialize( q, q[1] ); + d_qinfo[q].initialize( this, q, q[1] ); //debug print Trace("qcf-qregister") << "- Flattened structure is :" << std::endl; @@ -1797,7 +1855,7 @@ void QuantConflictFind::registerQuantifier( Node q ) { Trace("qcf-qregister") << std::endl; } } - + Trace("qcf-qregister") << "Done registering quantifier." << std::endl; } } @@ -1805,10 +1863,8 @@ void QuantConflictFind::registerQuantifier( Node q ) { short QuantConflictFind::getMaxQcfEffort() { if( options::qcfMode()==QCF_CONFLICT_ONLY ){ return effort_conflict; - }else if( options::qcfMode()==QCF_PROP_EQ ){ + }else if( options::qcfMode()==QCF_PROP_EQ || options::qcfMode()==QCF_PARTIAL ){ return effort_prop_eq; - }else if( options::qcfMode()==QCF_MC ){ - return effort_mc; }else{ return 0; } @@ -1833,16 +1889,13 @@ bool QuantConflictFind::areMatchDisequal( TNode n1, TNode n2 ) { //-------------------------------------------------- handling assertions / eqc void QuantConflictFind::assertNode( Node q ) { + /* if( d_quantEngine->hasOwnership( q, this ) ){ Trace("qcf-proc") << "QCF : assertQuantifier : "; debugPrintQuant("qcf-proc", q); Trace("qcf-proc") << std::endl; - d_qassert.push_back( q ); - //set the eqRegistries that this depends on to true - //for( std::map< EqRegistry *, bool >::iterator it = d_qinfo[q].d_rel_eqr.begin(); it != d_qinfo[q].d_rel_eqr.end(); ++it ){ - // it->first->d_active.set( true ); - //} } + */ } /** new node */ @@ -1904,28 +1957,12 @@ void QuantConflictFind::check( Theory::Effort level, unsigned quant_e ) { //determine order for quantified formulas std::vector< Node > qorder; - std::map< Node, bool > qassert; - //mark which are asserted - for( unsigned i=0; i<d_qassert.size(); i++ ){ - qassert[d_qassert[i]] = true; - } - //add which ones are specified in the order - for( unsigned i=0; i<d_quant_order.size(); i++ ){ - Node n = d_quant_order[i]; - if( std::find( qorder.begin(), qorder.end(), n )==qorder.end() && qassert.find( n )!=qassert.end() ){ - qorder.push_back( n ); - } - } - d_quant_order.clear(); - d_quant_order.insert( d_quant_order.begin(), qorder.begin(), qorder.end() ); - //add remaining - for( unsigned i=0; i<d_qassert.size(); i++ ){ - Node n = d_qassert[i]; - if( std::find( qorder.begin(), qorder.end(), n )==qorder.end() ){ - qorder.push_back( n ); + for( unsigned i=0; i<d_quantEngine->getModel()->getNumAssertedQuantifiers(); i++ ){ + Node q = d_quantEngine->getModel()->getAssertedQuantifier( i, true ); + if( d_quantEngine->hasOwnership( q, this ) ){ + qorder.push_back( q ); } } - if( Trace.isOn("qcf-debug") ){ Trace("qcf-debug") << std::endl; debugPrint("qcf-debug"); @@ -1974,7 +2011,7 @@ void QuantConflictFind::check( Theory::Effort level, unsigned quant_e ) { Trace("qcf-inst") << std::endl; ++addedLemmas; if( e==effort_conflict ){ - d_quant_order.insert( d_quant_order.begin(), q ); + d_quantEngine->markRelevant( q ); ++(d_statistics.d_conflict_inst); if( options::qcfAllConflict() ){ isConflict = true; @@ -1983,6 +2020,7 @@ void QuantConflictFind::check( Theory::Effort level, unsigned quant_e ) { } break; }else if( e==effort_prop_eq ){ + d_quantEngine->markRelevant( q ); ++(d_statistics.d_prop_inst); } }else{ @@ -2040,60 +2078,24 @@ void QuantConflictFind::computeRelevantEqr() { //d_uf_terms.clear(); //d_eqc_uf_terms.clear(); d_eqcs.clear(); - d_model_basis.clear(); //d_arg_reps.clear(); //double clSet = 0; //if( Trace.isOn("qcf-opt") ){ // clSet = double(clock())/double(CLOCKS_PER_SEC); //} - //long nTermst = 0; - //long nTerms = 0; - //long nEqc = 0; - - //which nodes are irrelevant for disequality matches - std::map< TNode, bool > irrelevant_dnode; //now, store matches eq::EqClassesIterator eqcs_i = eq::EqClassesIterator( getEqualityEngine() ); while( !eqcs_i.isFinished() ){ - //nEqc++; Node r = (*eqcs_i); if( getTermDatabase()->hasTermCurrent( r ) ){ TypeNode rtn = r.getType(); - if( options::qcfMode()==QCF_MC ){ - std::map< TypeNode, std::vector< TNode > >::iterator itt = d_eqcs.find( rtn ); - if( itt==d_eqcs.end() ){ - Node mb = getTermDatabase()->getModelBasisTerm( rtn ); - if( !getEqualityEngine()->hasTerm( mb ) ){ - Trace("qcf-warn") << "WARNING: Model basis term does not exist!" << std::endl; - Assert( false ); - } - Node mbr = getRepresentative( mb ); - if( mbr!=r ){ - d_eqcs[rtn].push_back( mbr ); - } - d_eqcs[rtn].push_back( r ); - d_model_basis[rtn] = mb; - }else{ - itt->second.push_back( r ); - } - }else{ - if( !options::cbqi() || !TermDb::hasInstConstAttr( r ) ){ - d_eqcs[rtn].push_back( r ); - } + if( !options::cbqi() || !TermDb::hasInstConstAttr( r ) ){ + d_eqcs[rtn].push_back( r ); } } ++eqcs_i; } - /* - if( Trace.isOn("qcf-opt") ){ - double clSet2 = double(clock())/double(CLOCKS_PER_SEC); - Trace("qcf-opt") << "Compute rel eqc : " << std::endl; - Trace("qcf-opt") << " " << nEqc << " equivalence classes. " << std::endl; - Trace("qcf-opt") << " " << nTerms << " / " << nTermst << " terms." << std::endl; - Trace("qcf-opt") << " Time : " << (clSet2-clSet) << std::endl; - } - */ } } @@ -2120,21 +2122,6 @@ void QuantConflictFind::debugPrint( const char * c ) { ++eqc_i; } Trace(c) << (pr ? " " : "" ) << "}" << std::endl; - /* - EqcInfo * eqcn = getEqcInfo( n, false ); - if( eqcn ){ - Trace(c) << " DEQ : {"; - pr = false; - for( NodeBoolMap::iterator it = eqcn->d_diseq.begin(); it != eqcn->d_diseq.end(); ++it ){ - if( (*it).second ){ - Trace(c) << (pr ? "," : "" ) << " " << (*it).first; - pr = true; - } - } - Trace(c) << (pr ? " " : "" ) << "}" << std::endl; - } - //} - */ ++eqcs_i; } } |