summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/examples
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMorgan Deters <mdeters@gmail.com>2012-10-05 22:46:27 +0000
committerMorgan Deters <mdeters@gmail.com>2012-10-05 22:46:27 +0000
commit129dadba47447148096acd216d61f93e14539cb4 (patch)
treefd0053624ee96ee84eb35d1542d1977e40830750 /examples
parent4c87c0794b7e954afd090cfbf441caa0b09c3ef5 (diff)
Bug-related:
* ITE removal fixed to be context-dependent (on UserContext). Resolves incrementality bugs 376 and 396 (which had given wrong answers). * some bugfixes for incrementality that Dejan found (fixes bug 394) * fix for bug in SmtEngine::getValue() where definitions weren't respected (partially resolves bug 411, but get-model is still broken). * change status of microwave21.ec.minimized.smt2 (it's actually unsat, but was labeled sat); re-enable it for "make regress" Also: * --check-model doesn't fail if quantified assertions don't simplify away. * fix some examples, and the Java system test, for the disappearance of the BoolExpr class * add copy constructor to array type enumerator (the type enumerator framework requires copy ctors, and the automatically-generated copy ctor was copying pointers that were then deleted, leaving dangling pointers in the copy and causing segfaults) * --dump=assertions now implies --dump=skolems * --dump=assertions:pre-<PASS> and --dump=assertions:post-<PASS> now allow you to dump before/after a particular preprocessing pass. E.g., --dump=assertions:pre-ite-removal or --dump=assertions:post-static-learning. "--dump=assertions" by itself is after all preprocessing, just before CNF conversion. * minor fixes to dumping output * include Model in language bindings Minor refactoring/misc: * fix compiler warning in src/theory/model.cpp * remove unnecessary SmtEngine::printModel(). * mkoptions script doesn't give progress output if stdout isn't a terminal (e.g., if it's written to a log, or piped through less(1), or whatever). * add some type enumerator unit tests * de-emphasize --parse-only and --preprocess-only (they aren't really "common" options) * fix some exception throw() specifications in SmtEngine * minor documentation clarifications
Diffstat (limited to 'examples')
-rw-r--r--examples/SimpleVC.java6
-rw-r--r--examples/SimpleVC.ml6
-rwxr-xr-xexamples/SimpleVC.php2
-rwxr-xr-xexamples/SimpleVC.pl2
-rwxr-xr-xexamples/SimpleVC.py4
-rwxr-xr-xexamples/SimpleVC.rb2
-rwxr-xr-xexamples/SimpleVC.tcl2
7 files changed, 12 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/examples/SimpleVC.java b/examples/SimpleVC.java
index 41c4542fd..4f4d19f24 100644
--- a/examples/SimpleVC.java
+++ b/examples/SimpleVC.java
@@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ public class SimpleVC {
Expr three = em.mkConst(new Rational(3));
Expr twox_plus_y_geq_3 = em.mkExpr(Kind.GEQ, twox_plus_y, three);
- BoolExpr formula =
- new BoolExpr(em.mkExpr(Kind.AND, x_positive, y_positive)).
- impExpr(new BoolExpr(twox_plus_y_geq_3));
+ Expr formula =
+ new Expr(em.mkExpr(Kind.AND, x_positive, y_positive)).
+ impExpr(new Expr(twox_plus_y_geq_3));
System.out.println("Checking validity of formula " + formula + " with CVC4.");
System.out.println("CVC4 should report VALID.");
diff --git a/examples/SimpleVC.ml b/examples/SimpleVC.ml
index dc75752db..c89341dc8 100644
--- a/examples/SimpleVC.ml
+++ b/examples/SimpleVC.ml
@@ -72,12 +72,12 @@ let twox_plus_y_geq_3 = em->mkExpr(geq, twox_plus_y, three)
let lhs = em->mkExpr(and_kind, x_positive, y_positive)
(* This fails for some reason. *)
-(* let rhs = new_BoolExpr(twox_plus_y_geq_3)
- let formula = new_BoolExpr(lhs)->impExpr(rhs) *)
+(* let rhs = new_Expr(twox_plus_y_geq_3)
+ let formula = new_Expr(lhs)->impExpr(rhs) *)
let formula = em->mkExpr(implies, lhs, twox_plus_y_geq_3)
-let bformula = new_BoolExpr(formula) in
+let bformula = new_Expr(formula) in
print_string "Checking validity of formula " ;
print_string (get_string (formula->toString ())) ;
diff --git a/examples/SimpleVC.php b/examples/SimpleVC.php
index eb58860cc..329446703 100755
--- a/examples/SimpleVC.php
+++ b/examples/SimpleVC.php
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ my $twox_plus_y = $em->mkExpr($CVC4::PLUS, $twox, $y);
my $three = $em->mkConst(new CVC4::Integer(3));
my $twox_plus_y_geq_3 = $em->mkExpr($CVC4::GEQ, $twox_plus_y, $three);
-my $formula = new CVC4::BoolExpr($em->mkExpr($CVC4::AND, $x_positive, $y_positive))->impExpr(new CVC4::BoolExpr($twox_plus_y_geq_3));
+my $formula = new CVC4::Expr($em->mkExpr($CVC4::AND, $x_positive, $y_positive))->impExpr(new CVC4::Expr($twox_plus_y_geq_3));
print "Checking validity of formula " . $formula->toString() . " with CVC4.\n";
print "CVC4 should report VALID.\n";
diff --git a/examples/SimpleVC.pl b/examples/SimpleVC.pl
index 6666d49e1..998c28bb0 100755
--- a/examples/SimpleVC.pl
+++ b/examples/SimpleVC.pl
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ my $twox_plus_y = $em->mkExpr($CVC4::PLUS, $twox, $y);
my $three = $em->mkConst(new CVC4::Integer(3));
my $twox_plus_y_geq_3 = $em->mkExpr($CVC4::GEQ, $twox_plus_y, $three);
-my $formula = new CVC4::BoolExpr($em->mkExpr($CVC4::AND, $x_positive, $y_positive))->impExpr(new CVC4::BoolExpr($twox_plus_y_geq_3));
+my $formula = new CVC4::Expr($em->mkExpr($CVC4::AND, $x_positive, $y_positive))->impExpr(new CVC4::Expr($twox_plus_y_geq_3));
print "Checking validity of formula " . $formula->toString() . " with CVC4.\n";
print "CVC4 should report VALID.\n";
diff --git a/examples/SimpleVC.py b/examples/SimpleVC.py
index d2bd6d4c3..a1cd1a6bd 100755
--- a/examples/SimpleVC.py
+++ b/examples/SimpleVC.py
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
####
import CVC4
-from CVC4 import ExprManager, SmtEngine, Integer, BoolExpr
+from CVC4 import ExprManager, SmtEngine, Integer, Expr
import sys
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ def main():
three = em.mkConst(Integer(3))
twox_plus_y_geq_3 = em.mkExpr(CVC4.GEQ, twox_plus_y, three)
- formula = BoolExpr(em.mkExpr(CVC4.AND, x_positive, y_positive)).impExpr(BoolExpr(twox_plus_y_geq_3))
+ formula = Expr(em.mkExpr(CVC4.AND, x_positive, y_positive)).impExpr(Expr(twox_plus_y_geq_3))
print "Checking validity of formula " + formula.toString() + " with CVC4."
print "CVC4 should report VALID."
diff --git a/examples/SimpleVC.rb b/examples/SimpleVC.rb
index 36af3c215..0d19ef49f 100755
--- a/examples/SimpleVC.rb
+++ b/examples/SimpleVC.rb
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ twox_plus_y = em.mkExpr(PLUS, twox, y)
three = em.mkConst(CVC4::Integer.new(3))
twox_plus_y_geq_3 = em.mkExpr(GEQ, twox_plus_y, three)
-formula = BoolExpr.new(em.mkExpr(AND, x_positive, y_positive)).impExpr(BoolExpr.new(twox_plus_y_geq_3))
+formula = Expr.new(em.mkExpr(AND, x_positive, y_positive)).impExpr(Expr.new(twox_plus_y_geq_3))
puts "Checking validity of formula " + formula.toString + " with CVC4."
puts "CVC4 should report VALID."
diff --git a/examples/SimpleVC.tcl b/examples/SimpleVC.tcl
index d2030f044..ed0decb26 100755
--- a/examples/SimpleVC.tcl
+++ b/examples/SimpleVC.tcl
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ set twox_plus_y [ExprManager_mkExpr em $PLUS $twox $y]
set three [ExprManager_mkConst em [Integer _ 3]]
set twox_plus_y_geq_3 [ExprManager_mkExpr em $GEQ $twox_plus_y $three]
-set formula [BoolExpr_impExpr [BoolExpr _1 [ExprManager_mkExpr em $AND $x_positive $y_positive]] [BoolExpr _2 $twox_plus_y_geq_3]]
+set formula [Expr_impExpr [Expr _1 [ExprManager_mkExpr em $AND $x_positive $y_positive]] [Expr _2 $twox_plus_y_geq_3]]
puts "Checking validity of formula [Expr_toString $formula] with CVC4."
puts "CVC4 should report VALID."
generated by cgit on debian on lair
contact matthew@masot.net with questions or feedback